SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
IBM
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
8220 178 0 IBM
Emcee:  Dave Lyall Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
7594I thought internal users of IBM components were now treated just like external cCharles Tutt-4/9/2002
7593This issue was debated a few years ago here on the thread. The consensus at thaArrow Hd.-4/9/2002
7592MB- Good Post!Jacques Newey-4/9/2002
7591ZDNet Article: When Will IBM Buy Sun Interesting Article. Thoughts Anyone? teKnight-4/9/2002
7590Hi Jonathan, there are two thoughts here. --The first is that IBM's OEM busArrow Hd.-4/9/2002
7589<i> The OEM business weakness is not surprising considering that their cusJonathan Edwards-4/9/2002
7588I've spent some time mulling over the likely effects of the CEO change. If Michael Bakunin-4/9/2002
7587stockcharts.com[w,a]waclyyay[pb50!b200][vc60][iUb14!La12,26,9]&pref=G Supposmchan-4/8/2002
7586Paul: Didn't know I was in good company here. Glad to see you're an IBMDavid-4/8/2002
7585If CIOs answer a survey indicating renewed spending, I would say most of it willScott Bergquist-4/8/2002
7584Apparently you did not notice that the quote you ascribe to me was from the artiRobert Scott Diver-4/8/2002
7583Got my annual report today. Very nice letter from Mr. Gerstner, and I liked thePaul Senior-4/8/2002
7582Good thoughts and some good input on FASB 142. The impairment test may come up Arrow Hd.-4/8/2002
7581Au contraire; I appreciate the good post. My thoughts: IBM has missed revenue Michael Bakunin-4/8/2002
7580Well Charles, you are probably right about nobody caring. Anyway, I'll biteArrow Hd.-4/8/2002
7579Down 10% +/- and only seven posts here to discuss it?! I guess nobody on SI is Charles Tutt-4/8/2002
7578Now, things are =really= looking up! RSD wrote "IT Spending Expectations HiScott Bergquist-4/8/2002
7577Kirk, thanks for the post. The OEM business weakness is not surprising consideArrow Hd.-4/8/2002
7576OOOOOOOOPPSS!!! IBM Warns of Sharp Downturn in Earnings "IBM's earninJacques Newey-4/8/2002
7575IBM sub $100 looks more attractive that IBM at $125...there are two elements to Axxel-4/8/2002
7574Press Release www-916.ibm.com IBM Statement On First-Quarter 2002 Results ARMKirk ©-4/8/2002
7573Just got back from a trip and saw the warning news this morning. Have not sorteArrow Hd.-4/8/2002
7572Does anyone have a link to the pre-release? I don't see it on Yahoo.... ElElroy-4/8/2002
7571IBM hits an 8-week low Things are =not= looking up, short-term. Finally, "bScott Bergquist-4/5/2002
7570IT Spending Expectations Hit 12 Month High Things are looking up in terms of buRobert Scott Diver-4/3/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News