SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
RED EMERALD RESOURCES
An SI Board Since June 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
862 2 0 NRY
Emcee:  hugh thorne Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
762 There are some people who are only on this thread so I prefer to keep both goinMartin-12/8/1999
761 why don't we just go to the other thread. i can't be bothered asking aghugh thorne-12/8/1999
760 Asked SI about the name change again. Let's see if they can get it right.Martin-12/8/1999
759 Once again i agree with Martins comments, i think he has appropriately distinguhugh thorne-12/4/1999
758 Interesting article. I don't think it really applies to us though for fourMartin-12/3/1999
757 <i>Perhaps they wanted some more to average down. </i> My thoughtskidl-12/3/1999
756 Somebody paid over $1.80 Canadian to get the shares we got right now. Perhaps russet-12/3/1999
755 Sure looked to me like someone was very anxious to keep the price in it's ckidl-12/3/1999
754 i guess i am missing something here?hugh thorne-12/3/1999
753 3.5k trade at .95 with 1k being offered at 1.00 Within seconds 1k appears on thkidl-12/3/1999
752 fax them. if everyone writing and lurking faxed a letter to BM and Baylee it chugh thorne-12/3/1999
751 <i>I still think everyone should pressure the "public" side of kidl-12/3/1999
750 I thought the rest of the money went to the 900k payment to keep the equity holhugh thorne-12/3/1999
749 Well. There is enough cash for the December payment now and enough left over fMartin-12/3/1999
748 i have always tried to be objective in my "wailings", and tried to eshugh thorne-12/1/1999
747 Hell why not just do a split. Probably wouldn't hurt the current share priMartin-11/30/1999
746 Your right Kidl... I apologized..but I couldn't resist. Claude Cormier-11/30/1999
745 It's not nice to step on already vertically challenged hamsters :-(kidl-11/30/1999
744 Time for another reverse split maybe ? <g> Claude Cormier-11/30/1999
743 For all the PP'ers; you can't bail because you paid 5 dollars to get inhugh thorne-11/26/1999
742 lets see, we have someone running a public company who can't write a news rhugh thorne-11/24/1999
741 I think that is perhaps a bit to Machiavellian. Maybe just a case of being incMartin-11/21/1999
740 <i>lets do something to improve the share value as it is now obvious thatkidl-11/21/1999
739 i faxed a copy of a stockhouse post to McAlister this afternoon. I suggest thathugh thorne-11/20/1999
738 Claude, gosh you forgot about all those "cabachons", looks like therehugh thorne-11/19/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News