SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
COMS/USRX
An SI Board Since February 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1384 5 0 COMS
Emcee:  Jeffery E. Forrest Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
784 I think there may be a logic error in your analysis. e.g. if NIC's sales pAlan Casey-3/11/1997
783 If you only have $4,000.00, and don't want to hold on for 6 months time, tStau-3/11/1997
782 sunny, your calcs look fine to me, if NICs do contribute less than 50% to overaDwight E. Karlsen-3/11/1997
781 Thanks a lot Dwight! If I have the right understanding the latest statement abosunny-3/11/1997
780 Good afternoon sunny. Xy posted the First Call data 3-5-97. Link: techstocks.cDwight E. Karlsen-3/11/1997
779 Anyone: do you know what the EPS estimate for the current COMS quarter were thesunny-3/11/1997
778 Simon, Thought you had loads of money from your LSI profits. Not only will you Art Ebbands-3/11/1997
777 Simon, Well, since USRX is trading below 1.75*COMS right now, when settlement Eric Prigge-3/10/1997
776 Eric or anyone willing to help me: Since I'm not a financial genious, I neesimon says-3/10/1997
775 Simon says, If you believe that the USRX/COMS merger will be successful, you oEric Prigge-3/10/1997
774 To all: help for a prospective COMS investor I'm seriosly considering buyinsimon says-3/10/1997
773 Thanks for the reply. I appreciate that not everyone is a techno-weenie (like mStau-3/10/1997
772 The ANALysts are no more than a bunch of idiots who do no more than try and estRAY WACLAWSKY-3/10/1997
771 "ALL, looks like COMS/USRX to be affected by another cisco CSCO downgradeGlenn D. Rudolph-3/10/1997
770 Xy, $0.50 from COMS would be good. They've already said ~$0.45. That'Price Monger-3/10/1997
769 Michael, It seems as thought the market does the opposite of what one might exGlenn D. Rudolph-3/10/1997
768 Short position is insignificant. As of 3/7 USRX 5.79 M and COMS 5.85 M.Zoran-3/10/1997
767 Looking at the record high trading volume of CSCO, and its way all the way up tXpiderman-3/10/1997
766 Today showed me that I have no clue to how the market works. When I saw CSCO aMichael Anthony-3/10/1997
765 It now feels like COMS has bottomed and is heading higher. The very negative nthomas hayden-3/10/1997
764 A major short squeeze occurred today in AOL (up 5, to 47), anyone know how manyXpiderman-3/10/1997
763 good marriage!Tom Nguyen-3/10/1997
762 Stau - The VAST majority of the world is not a technical weenie like you and nMark Lijewski-3/10/1997
761 3Com software what-cha-ma-call-it........ biz.yahoo.comScrapps-3/10/1997
760 SKOKIE, Ill.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--March 10, 1997-- New System Presents New Buemichael-3/10/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News