RED EMERALD RESOURCES | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy
RED EMERALD RESOURCES

An SI Board Since June 1997

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
862	2	0	NRY

Emcee: hugh thorne	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
787	the nov release clearly indicated that the numbers were just not coming out as	hugh thorne	-	1/18/2000
786	Hi Claude, Are you hearing our yelping and hollering where you are. I told th	russet	-	1/17/2000
785	Hugh: What can you say about the current process? They have told us nothing.	Martin	-	1/17/2000
784	and as i suggested in my long winded post, i think this is the problem and we a	hugh thorne	-	1/17/2000
783	russett, I would rather get a confirmation that the mine can produce thos 50,0	Claude Cormier	-	1/17/2000
782	thanks for the post and i agree with what you say. however the conclusion of th	hugh thorne	-	1/17/2000
781	Unlike many miners, who can sell all they produce, RED sales of the various gra	russet	-	1/17/2000
780	russett, i thought the feasability study etc was for the purposes of projection	hugh thorne	-	1/17/2000
779	Most people expect all managements to be superhumans with perfect knowledge of	russet	-	1/15/2000
778	You have accurately described the current state of affairs IMO The 'market	Martin	-	1/15/2000
777	Hi Hugh, With no earnings numbers to crunch, and no real projections to go on,	russet	-	1/15/2000
776	i assume the silence on my valuation is not agreement. anyway, as i posted on	hugh thorne	-	1/15/2000
775	This stock is either undervalued or it isn't. Seems simple enough on the su	hugh thorne	-	1/9/2000
774	It wouldn't take that many carats to generate enough revenue to pay off the	Martin	-	12/29/1999
773	you are a little more optimistic then i am. i can't see them generating tha	hugh thorne	-	12/29/1999
772	Yes. June of 2000 is the next payment but I would be surprised if the entire r	Martin	-	12/29/1999
771	If i remember correctly, these guys owe another million US in June of 2000. Ass	hugh thorne	-	12/29/1999
770	Two threads aren't a bad thing Hugh. More people will get to know about th	Martin	-	12/27/1999
769	Having 2 threads is a bloody curse, i wonder if they would delete the other. A	hugh thorne	-	12/27/1999
768	I agree, assuming they can get the material into inventory at the appropriate s	hugh thorne	-	12/20/1999
767	Thanks Hugh. I thought you'd forgotten about the RRSP aspect. Russett: I	Martin	-	12/17/1999
766	looks like the name finally did happen. still no answer on the RRSP issue; wil	hugh thorne	-	12/17/1999
765	Long term hold. It will take several years to market this rare gem. One day,	russet	-	12/16/1999
764	Just received an e-mail that they changed the name. And they did! Anyone hear	Martin	-	12/16/1999
763	Haywood sort of has this stock to itself,...see market depth. <i>http://w	russet	-	12/10/1999

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):