SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
PLFM - Undervalued with great potential
An SI Board Since February 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
9096 26 0 PLFM
Emcee:  Rich Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
7896 Thanks for the update George. It sounds as though we may have to wait some timeNicK S-5/24/1999
7895 Thanks, Ready & waiting for this "quiet period" to end. As they walleye-5/24/1999
7894 By: GeorgeSLC Reply To: NoneMonday, 24 May 1999 at 1:35 PM EDT Post # of 947 TaGHart-5/24/1999
7893 <i>I really believe the ARC system will be profitable due to its low stargeorge eberting-5/23/1999
7892 Cliff, I agree that cost isn't the only reason for the fall (sic) of IRID.Bruce A. Thompson-5/23/1999
7891 Bruce, I don't think that cost was the only drawback keeping iridium out ocliff weller-5/21/1999
7890 I always thought the Iridium idea was stupid. They should just give it up, takecliff emohs-5/21/1999
7889 Cliff, IRID was the biggest threat to the ARC technology. If they ever got thBruce A. Thompson-5/21/1999
7888 Big ouch for motorola, Mini ouch for us as iridium may have been a user of plfcliff weller-5/21/1999
7887 OUCH !!! dailynews.yahoo.comCarol Putnam-5/21/1999
7886 An interesting article on the games of the Market Makers: forbes.comSteven M. Kaplan-5/21/1999
7885 Its tricky. I got it to work this way. I only used www.homestead.com to get to one_less-5/21/1999
7884 It's good that we don't have an exact date of when the 90 day quiet perJames-5/21/1999
7883 pom: couldn't get the homestead link to work?? george eberting-5/21/1999
7882 I don't think the IR people would be "working" on the contract...JetSkier-5/21/1999
7881 "We currently have all available manpower working on this contract. We dopom-5/21/1999
7880 Does anyone at all on this thread have any contact directly with the Company? george eberting-5/20/1999
7879 simply more about grastistel gratistel.com not much that concern us a the mopom-5/20/1999
7878 thanks....... the runUP to the 90's woke me UP! the longer this <i>BishopsChild-5/20/1999
7877 No, it was Novatel AB. By the way, I'm using elibrary.com to do much of myCarol Putnam-5/20/1999
7876 I thought PLFM <i>dumped</i> Grasitel ? Hmmmmmmmmmm........ wasnt tBishopsChild-5/20/1999
7875 Damn you are good, Carol. I skimmed through the site. Just image if PLFM links cliff emohs-5/20/1999
7874 Well, I don't know if there is any connection since PLFM removed the LennarCarol Putnam-5/20/1999
7873 Thanks George, I see too many pluses for it to tank, but it sure makes it roughokelly-5/20/1999
7872 What happens at the end of quiet periods depends entirely on the news at the engeorge eberting-5/20/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):