SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
ocom breakthrough technology
An SI Board Since April 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
994 11 0 OCOM
Emcee:  james nowak Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
794 A key in the use of analog campus type systems is the capability to extend thetelephonics-12/12/1998
793 Campus analog-twisted pair same as OCOM.telephonics-12/11/1998
792 MMAC- Do they use twisted pair or use cable you have to install? oki oki kwon-12/11/1998
791 I spent the better part of today at the new MMAC Federal Systems demonstrationtelephonics-12/10/1998
790 I think you are trying to erase the corporate memory. telephonics-12/4/1998
789 $540 million in inventory. No way unless it is actually government property awatelephonics-12/4/1998
788 <<I don't not believe UNYSIS will pay for equipment before it has beemod-12/4/1998
787 Thanks for jogging my old memory. I believe OCOM owes considerable money to thitelephonics-12/4/1998
786 Here's my guess as to why Unysis agreed to this news release. The personneltelephonics-12/4/1998
785 SANM is the Nasdaq symbol for Sanmina Corporation An old press release - ObjRajiv-12/4/1998
784 Sorry. I do not accept your statement that the debtors have been paid. A large telephonics-12/4/1998
783 who is sanm??? telephonics-12/4/1998
782 I have to disagree with you. I believe the company has built up a several millitelephonics-12/4/1998
781 <i> Rajiv,are Washinton Post columnist? </i> I do not work for WaRajiv-12/3/1998
780 Rajiv,are Washinton Post columnist? I saw the same first name on yesterday busioki kwon-12/3/1998
779 <i> They've already paid them </i> I have to disagree.. They hRajiv-12/3/1998
778 They've already paid them, that's one of the places their original $28 mod-12/3/1998
777 Not unless ,they don't pay the component supplier. How about the cost incurtelephonics-12/3/1998
776 Your numbers are incorrect. Selling $1 million of existing inventory to Unisysmod-12/3/1998
775 Good comments. Lets assume it is a real purchase and the $1million has be paitelephonics-12/3/1998
774 On the other hand,if the news release is a spin (Washington D.C. terminology) otelephonics-12/2/1998
773 <<The order for $1 M, is however not very significant in terms of what itmod-12/1/1998
772 I agree that this looks like a purchase order. telephonics is right to ask, tQ.-12/1/1998
771 An order is an order. While OCOM might arguably have an incentive to mislead, mod-11/30/1998
770 Are you sure this is a purchase??The wording of the news release is somewhat sutelephonics-11/30/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News