SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Bill Wexler's Dog Pound
An SI Board Since March 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10293 141 0 REFR
Emcee:  Bill Wexler Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
8043Bink, I know your purpose here is to defend REFR but I would assume that IF yoHank-7/4/2001
8042Infostream, I have seen and played with all the demos in person. I have not spBinkY2K-7/3/2001
8041<i>I repeat my assertion. Lumping REFR with things you consider frauds is RockyBalboa-7/3/2001
8040Bill, you clearly are talking about someone else. I have never cared about ZincBinkY2K-7/3/2001
8039Bill, you clearly are talking about someone else. I have never cared about ZincBinkY2K-7/3/2001
8038yeah, but Bloussant works.Ben Wa-7/3/2001
8037That's actually a very interesting idea (and I'm not trying to be facetiBill Wexler-7/3/2001
8036Infostream, why? I stated the facts. If you mention REFR negatively, I will posBinkY2K-7/2/2001
8035careful chr., he is going to tell Missus Jones the principal and she will canceloldirtybastard-7/2/2001
8034This is a threatening comment. you could be banned for that. idiot.RockyBalboa-7/2/2001
8033Bill, Remember what happens when REFR is mentioned here negatively? Your boardBinkY2K-7/2/2001
8032I try not to stare at roadkill much - it just slows down traffic. ;<) I havDale Baker-7/2/2001
8031Bigger cult stock? REFR or GUMM? I've been reading some of the rants postBill Wexler-7/2/2001
8030Et tu, LU? Hey Dale, long time no chat... I bought a tiny bit of LU last ThursBill Wexler-7/2/2001
8029So Kevin is ignoring me by reading my posts on the Raging Bull REFR board. QuitBinkY2K-6/25/2001
8028Even though I have him on ignore here (and Bink, if you're reading this and Kevin Podsiadlik-6/25/2001
8027Hank, good advice. I appreciate your serious answer about biotech. Although I wBinkY2K-6/24/2001
8026Biotech,in general, should be left to those who thoroughly understand what a comHank-6/24/2001
8025Hank, I do not care about GUMM. I wish you success in whatever stocks you wish tBinkY2K-6/23/2001
8024"So, this bloated short position is actually quite welcome. It is very tempHank-6/23/2001
8023Hank, have you read: cfs-news.org recently? I have. I think Asensio is quite vuBinkY2K-6/22/2001
8022I never thought it possible, DinkY-2K, but I think you are in serious contentionHank-6/22/2001
8021Kevin, you are deluded in assuming I ever give up. You seem to assume your god, BinkY2K-6/22/2001
8020Shrirlitz, I am glad you feel sorry for me. It makes my day so much better. WhBinkY2K-6/22/2001
8019Doesn't bother me that much (at least not *yet*)Bill Wexler-6/22/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News