SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
John EDWARDS for President
An SI Board Since February 2004
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1381 5 0
Emcee:  Ann Corrigan Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
81Edwards would definitely be the strongest candidate the Democrats could put forwBrumar89-2/18/2004
80Glenn, I consider my position on Election 2004 to be somewhat relevant. In 2000 Ann Corrigan-2/18/2004
79John Kennedy looked as young as Edwards so that's a positive. Edwards is onAnn Corrigan-2/18/2004
78Ann, I doubt that Zogby would skew the results to please a client. In the pollGlenn Petersen-2/18/2004
77They do not have the same trade beliefs, unless this is another one of those manAnn Corrigan-2/18/2004
76John Edwards has to get the nomination because I can't vote for John Kerry. Ann Corrigan-2/18/2004
75Thx! Wonderful! / eomlaura_bush-2/18/2004
74Kerry cannot pull enough of the swing voters away from Repubs. Edwards can do iAnn Corrigan-2/18/2004
73Hi Glenn, Excerpt from that Zogby poll: >>A new poll conducted by Zogby InAnn Corrigan-2/18/2004
72Go ahead and back Edwards but Kerry is going to win, and for very good reasons. American Spirit-2/18/2004
71I received this email just a few moments ago from the Dean campaign. What a clalaura_bush-2/18/2004
70I found something similar JOHN EDWARDS: Son’s death changed life freep.commicrohoogle!-2/18/2004
69Very little to debate about since they agree on almost everything. In fact KerryAmerican Spirit-2/18/2004
68Cool. Perhaps you might post a link if you have time to find it. I didn't klaura_bush-2/18/2004
67There was one article in Washington Post a year (or more) ago on John Edwards. Tmicrohoogle!-2/18/2004
66Well good that you did not get ticked off :-). My targets of ridicule were rabidmicrohoogle!-2/18/2004
65Yes, Ms. Corrigan: you can assume that. -g- Keep in mind that I'm not the rlaura_bush-2/18/2004
64Kerry was given a free ride by the media. Last night's Wisc results finallyAnn Corrigan-2/18/2004
63Yes, SearchRE, I believe that's true. Dem voters are having buyers remorse.Ann Corrigan-2/18/2004
62Welcome Laura. We extend southern hospitality to all SI posters at the John EdwaAnn Corrigan-2/18/2004
61I don't think Dean will explicitly endorse Edwards in the primaries. But wilmicrohoogle!-2/18/2004
60AS, As Edwards himself explains in his stump speech, he defended individuals agaAnn Corrigan-2/18/2004
59Hi, Ann Corrigan! Super of you to start this thread! I think Edwards would be alaura_bush-2/18/2004
58Zogby just completed a poll that is more focused on the red and blue states. BuGlenn Petersen-2/18/2004
57IS KERRY AN EARLY PEAKER? Wisconsin results might indicate so.SeachRE-2/18/2004
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News