SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING
An SI Board Since February 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
21057 16 0
Emcee:  Peter Dierks Type:  Moderated
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
8133Okay, then his anti- religious animus is hard to distinguish from anti- semitismNeocon-4/10/2002
8132<b>BILL, JLA:</b> We've got another stupid liberal pompous leftiLazarus_Long-4/10/2002
8131<i>Thus, for example, we invoke the Constitution and the Founding Fathers Lane3-4/10/2002
8130Ahhh. Thank you. Point taken, and it's a good one.Poet-4/10/2002
8129Once again, you claim 'success' - at what? Demonstrating your inanity? thames_sider-4/10/2002
8128I posted that "to the thread", hon. It wasn't personal.Poet-4/10/2002
8127Drat, I missed it. ;-(Poet-4/10/2002
8126Life is never simple. I really don't understand the hesitancy (or shall Ijcky-4/10/2002
8125Any news report concerning John Ashcroft should rightfully be reported on the JoTigerPaw-4/10/2002
8124That was one of the sources of offense. I actually am Jewish (in part), and haveNeocon-4/10/2002
8123You are. JUST KIDDING, I COULDN'T RESIST!E-4/10/2002
8122Once again, no meaningful answer from the second turkey in the chorus. LOL. (BTthames_sider-4/10/2002
8121Coulda used the dough......LOL!Neocon-4/10/2002
8120A smirk is not an "appearance" thing as, for example, a harelip would E-4/10/2002
8119Speaking of Ashcroft...I just heard him say that he this murder case would be prMulhollandDrive-4/10/2002
8118That is just crap. The point was never that, as I have reiterated over and over.Neocon-4/10/2002
8117You think I've got 3 SI accounts: "Bill", "jlallen", anLazarus_Long-4/10/2002
8116<i>Belaboring an untenable thesis, to wit, that Judaism is racially based,Lane3-4/10/2002
8115It is a pretty good site. I have a more complicated idea of the role of traditioNeocon-4/10/2002
8114No. But I play one on TV.....jlallen-4/10/2002
8113<i>I'm not sure I understand how this might stir up a hornet's nesTigerPaw-4/10/2002
8112Well, you could start by getting your targets right.Lazarus_Long-4/10/2002
8111I taped it but haven't watched it yet. I found this article in the Arizona Lane3-4/10/2002
8110HEY! What do I have to do with this, huh? Huh? I wasn't even awake at theLazarus_Long-4/10/2002
8109True. Even today, some don't consider it treason because we have not identifBill-4/10/2002
8108Did you see Ashcroft last night on Letterman? I couldn't stay awake long enoBald Eagle-4/10/2002
8107sounds just like them are you sure your not Hungarian?Rainy_Day_Woman-4/10/2002
8106someone told me what it meant mr allen is in serious trouble [as usual]Rainy_Day_Woman-4/10/2002
8105we noticedRainy_Day_Woman-4/10/2002
8104<i><i>you ignored the obviously traitorous acts of this individual&lLane3-4/10/2002
8103Nope, my hatred for treason is much greater than my disdain for Ashcroft. She sPoet-4/10/2002
8102LOL! Get your hot hands out of my pocket.Poet-4/10/2002
8101In that prior post, you ignored the obviously treasonous acts of this individualBill-4/10/2002
8100You certainly know an enormous amount of Jewish history, Neo. Thanks for the exPoet-4/10/2002
8099How to fool the DNA experts... <i>Victim happy doctor convicted of sex asJ. C. Dithers-4/10/2002
8098Sorry, the ten bucks is already spoken for. -gg-Bill-4/10/2002
8097I stand corrected, thought it had occured after 9-11. I still don't think SPoet-4/10/2002
8096It is very simple. Belaboring an untenable thesis, to wit, that Judaism is raciaNeocon-4/10/2002
8095That's really interesting, Tiger Paw. I know very little about ancient histPoet-4/10/2002
8094<I><< And BTW, I think what Lynn Stewart did was wrong, but I'd Bill-4/10/2002
8093At the risk of stirring up a hornets nest.... At or about 1000ad when Vladamir tTigerPaw-4/10/2002
8092Someone just mentioned in PM that the Drudge piece on bin Laden that I posted thPoet-4/10/2002
8091<i>Justice cuts both ways, and I don't think it is simple at all to fiLane3-4/10/2002
8090LOL! I'm trying to restrain myself until noontime. That's a great one,Poet-4/10/2002
8089Good point.jlallen-4/10/2002
8088<i>passive resistance only, fully documented with realtime television by sTigerPaw-4/10/2002
8087DON'T GET ME STARTED! Help, help! Blow ye winds, Like the trumpet blows, BuE-4/10/2002
8086<i>It seems like common sense to me, that is, allowing the most recent andJ. C. Dithers-4/10/2002
8085Not that I remember, but link me if you'd like. Let me know your thoughts oPoet-4/10/2002
8084Didn't you once call Rush Limbaugh fat? And comment on W's facial "Bill-4/10/2002
8083I would have awarded her the ten bucks, but the gratuitous mentioning of StewartPoet-4/10/2002
8082The videotape must be quite damning then.MulhollandDrive-4/10/2002
8081Would you call talking about an indictment against a traitorous attorney substanBill-4/10/2002
8080How shall I divvy up the spoils? Penny rolls? :-)Poet-4/10/2002
8079Applicants and apparently graduates too.... JLAjlallen-4/10/2002
8078Agree. But you will see the privilege issue asserted. I guarantee!!!jlallen-4/10/2002
8077>>This will be an interesting case to follow. << I think so too. VMulhollandDrive-4/10/2002
8076<i>surely she knew about the court order.</i> I meant to say "Lane3-4/10/2002
8075Also in fairness, it could have been akin to Lyn Nofsinger. (naahh...) :-)Bill-4/10/2002
8074Ok I see...so she would have been subject to an indictment even under the old ruMulhollandDrive-4/10/2002
8073>>The caption under the picture says it all. -g << LOL!! Very funnMulhollandDrive-4/10/2002
8072Yes, the sheik will now be subject to the new rule. The basis of the indictmentLane3-4/10/2002
8071Catching it from all sides... Tucson, Arizona Wednesday, 10 April 2002 Bush cLane3-4/10/2002
8070Oh gaawwd, people like her give me the heebie-geebies. Perhaps she'll finallBill-4/10/2002
8069<i>"The attorney general declared the sheik would be the first terrorMulhollandDrive-4/10/2002
8068< This situation reminds me of the Catholic Church and its pedophiles. Gotta jcky-4/10/2002
8067<i><b>The debate over DNA testing has tended to break down along libE-4/10/2002
8066Has the quality of applicants to law school been slipping? <g>jcky-4/10/2002
8065I guess if that doesn't work she can resort to crying..check our her pic....MulhollandDrive-4/10/2002
8064From what I saw on TV, it seems that they had a court order. The application ofLane3-4/10/2002
8063That would have been a good post to thames_sider who started this thread down thBill-4/10/2002
8062<i>I don't view this issue as a right of prisoners, but rather, a dutyLane3-4/10/2002
8061I think the only real test will be if the taping was legal without a court orderMulhollandDrive-4/10/2002
8060LOL. Looks like she'll have to plead the not-guilty-by-reason-of-stupidity dBill-4/10/2002
8059Yep. And they will pompously assert Attorney Client privilege.....betcha!!!jlallen-4/10/2002
8058Absolutely... And they were informed they were being monitored....and they wereMulhollandDrive-4/10/2002
8057Excellent! BTW, there is no privilege which protects a lawyer's complicity jlallen-4/10/2002
8056It seems like common sense to me, that is, allowing the most recent and accuratejcky-4/10/2002
8055I was wondering why they provided no evidence, like a photograph, this time. I sE-4/10/2002
8054Well, this stupid liberal pompous leftist will leave you brilliant fascist humblPoet-4/10/2002
8053Speaking of stupid, liberal, pompous leftists.....gotta love this one.... This MulhollandDrive-4/10/2002
8052I hope we kill him before he manages to orchestrate another terrorist event. AnPoet-4/10/2002
8051I disagree about the empirical truth Bill just posted. Scary ? Yes. But I takjlallen-4/10/2002
8050And that ain't one of them. Did you see the Drudge report I posted? Scary,Poet-4/10/2002
8049How so? There are certain empirical truths, ya know....jlallen-4/10/2002
8048It must be startling to live in a black and white world. ;-)Poet-4/10/2002
8047The left is the exclusive domain of "pompous AND stupid". Especially tBill-4/10/2002
8046Yeah. Pompous AND stupid is a particularly unattractive mix in a leftie.... Sojlallen-4/10/2002
8045Exactly. Don't you just love the lefties who brag about how smart they are,Bill-4/10/2002
8044ROFL!!! Like shooting fish in a barrel, isn't it?? JLAjlallen-4/10/2002
8043Guess that depends on how you define "bad".<g> JLAjlallen-4/10/2002
8042You give me way too much credit. Everyone knows it takes neither powerful prose Bill-4/10/2002
8041Wow! Pomposity factor off the scale on that post. Bill must have really struckjlallen-4/10/2002
8040Check this out, from last night's Drudge report: Bin Laden safe, planning nPoet-4/10/2002
8039I could pretend I care so you could point out this huge defeat supposedly inflicthames_sider-4/10/2002
8038I thought it was charming....<GGG> Veddy, veddy charming, Sheddy.......jlallen-4/10/2002
8037Nope. Not what I was referring to. You demolib pinheads are so disingenuous (dijlallen-4/10/2002
8036Hahaha I love that one about cowardice.Poet-4/10/2002
8035LOL! I know it was a cheap grub. I can't help myself. There are so many smPoet-4/10/2002
8034Yep, Arabs are Semites. And boy are you right about the Palestinians needing a Poet-4/10/2002
Previous 100 | Next 100 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):