SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
ocom breakthrough technology
An SI Board Since April 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
994 11 0 OCOM
Emcee:  james nowak Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
819 Intel to invest $30 mil in PCTL and to develop PC based VC system. This gives coki kwon-1/19/1999
818 I think it is past.I really don't understand all this. telephonics-1/16/1999
817 99 Company request for copy of this RFP have beenb received by the government. telephonics-1/13/1999
816 MMAC and Broadcast>com are rumored to be talking.MMAC stock and volume leapetelephonics-1/11/1999
815 Sorry-should have read the RFP at www.uscourts.gov/review/html a bit more careftelephonics-1/11/1999
814 The U.S. Court has issued an RFP for the procurement of video teleconferencing telephonics-1/10/1999
813 Isn't the critical date now past??? telephonics-1/10/1999
812 there is great pressure on ocom. ocom cautions callers on the work going on tralph keating-1/9/1999
811 dont forget some of the convertable holders are insiders so I would assume we wralph keating-1/9/1999
810 So what happened on Friday and why was this date so critcal in your opinion??telephonics-1/9/1999
809 See my post on the Yahoo board telephonics-1/7/1999
808 Anyone hearing anything? They need this by Fri. Willy-1/6/1999
807 I think OCOM is finding it difficult to raise money because of the existing conRajiv-1/4/1999
806 Nasdaq has a set of requirements for maintaining listing (net tangible assets, Rajiv-1/4/1999
805 I'm a short that boxed @2 I think a lot of the selling was end of year taxralph keating-1/3/1999
804 Hi Willy, I am still hang in here with ocom. I know lots of peoples have the saoki kwon-1/3/1999
803 Why would they be de listed? Willy-1/3/1999
802 <i> Does anyone have a indicator of shorts left in this junk. </i> Rajiv-1/2/1999
801 Anyone have any thoughts. I guess what can you say. Either they get the loan anWilly-1/2/1999
800 If you reread my post I made the point about the OCOM advantage in this regard.telephonics-12/21/1998
799 I do believe your remark in reference to naive. By the way-assuming the Vidphontelephonics-12/19/1998
798 Thanks for the details. Point well made with regard to access to a core marketdhp-12/16/1998
797 Next to Silicon Valley there is no bigger pool of technical talent than the Wastelephonics-12/16/1998
796 It is my understanding that the move to NH had much more to with finding an avadhp-12/15/1998
795 Whats going on? Not a single post since 12 Dec.telephonics-12/14/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News