Sharks in the Septic Tank | Political Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics
Sharks in the Septic Tank

An SI Board Since December 2000

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
82486	46	0

Emcee: YlangYlangBreeze	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
82461	Aren't we getting bogged down here in the Pile of Sand Paradox dilemma?	one_less	1	4/20/2012
82460	"Person" is not as useful of term because of its vagueness. My opin	TimF	-	4/14/2012
82459	"Personhood is vaguely defined and can apply to such things as corporations	Solon	-	4/6/2012
82458	<I> The discussion of abortion is about the personhood of various forms of	TimF	2	4/6/2012
82457	That is not an argument. The discussion of abortion is about the personhood of v	Solon	2	4/6/2012
82456	Yes it is.	TimF	1	4/6/2012
82455	"A human embryo is a human being" No, it isn't.	Solon	1	4/6/2012
82454	<I> A human embryo is human. </I> A human arm is human. A human	TimF	1	4/6/2012
82453	"Which doesn't make it non-existent or even irrelevant." Never sa	Solon	-	4/6/2012
82452	<I> That conversation was a long time ago. </i> Which doesn't	TimF	-	4/6/2012
82451	"The reply is in the context of the whole conversation" The reply wa	Solon	-	4/6/2012
82450	I picked up a conversation that we had been having years ago (I held off on it w	TimF	-	4/6/2012
82449	"It followed the same point I've been making all along. That's no v	Solon	-	4/6/2012
82448	<I> ANyone can see I post generally accepted definitions </i> No	TimF	-	4/6/2012
82447	It followed the same point I've been making all along. That's no veerin	TimF	1	4/6/2012
82446	"That isn't a non-seqitur, even in the way your misinterpreting it it w	Solon	-	4/6/2012
82445	That isn't a non-seqitur, even in the way your misinterpreting it it would b	TimF	1	4/6/2012
82444	Your non sequitor said: "Having human DNA is evidence that its a human&quo	Solon	-	4/6/2012
82443	<I> Your post was a non sequitor. </i> Nonsense <I> Nobody	TimF	-	4/6/2012
82442	My post was about being a "person". <<And my post, which you r	Solon	-	4/6/2012
82441	<I> My post was about being a "person". </i> And my post	TimF	-	4/6/2012
82440	My post was about being a "person". That is a legal and philosophical	Solon	-	4/6/2012
82439	So?	Solon	-	4/6/2012
82438	"Not part of her body." The Supreme Court ruled that it WAS a body p	Solon	-	4/6/2012
82437	Having DNA isn't sufficient to be human. Having separate DNA is evidence th	TimF	1	4/6/2012

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):