SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Lidak Pharm. [LDAKA]
An SI Board Since November 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1115 2 0 LDAKA
Emcee:  Barry Rost Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
840 Michael we need to see a lot more of the details. Regardles of what they termHenry Volquardsen-1/15/1998
839 <i>$80 to $130 million dollar financing on a non-dilutive basis in three MCorbley-1/15/1998
838 Here's the Bloomberg story, it's a bit more specific: La Jolla, CHenry Volquardsen-1/15/1998
837 Anyone know anything about HealthMed?Henry Volquardsen-1/15/1998
836 Today will be more interesting than you thought Luis, LIDAK Pharmaceuticals ReHenry Volquardsen-1/15/1998
835 Tomorrow will be very interesting.. if we punch through resistance it could easluis a. garcia-1/14/1998
834 John, "Not sure why the lidak discussion ended up on Yahoo. I like the SI Roland Chen-1/13/1998
833 over the counter the only way to go biggest $ to be made via that route hope henry jakala-1/13/1998
832 I thought Hniman was a bit too negative about the stock... just didn't knoluis a. garcia-1/13/1998
831 Lidak gets some good press. This is probably the reason for Lidak's recent Red Dragon-1/13/1998
830 To all, most of the good Lidak discussion is on the Yahoo msgs. If you start aJohn Zwiener-1/13/1998
829 Roland, The thought of shorting BI's recommendations sounds like a real moCharles Holewinski-1/11/1998
828 Red Dragon, I really like your mathematically analysis. And I totally agree witRoland Chen-1/9/1998
827 Michael: Thanks for pointing out your correction. Lidakol does appear in a someRed Dragon-1/9/1998
826 Therefore my posts 433 and 818 should read: Lidakol vs. Zovirax: In 1995,MCorbley-1/9/1998
825 BIG mistake by me regarding Lidakol and Zovirax: I can't believe that I poMCorbley-1/9/1998
824 Hi Red, Saw your post in which you mentioned that your were introduced to LIDACharles Holewinski-1/9/1998
823 Sorry, guys, but remember the number one rule of stocks: Don't fall in loveRed Dragon-1/8/1998
822 Luis, I am definetly staying with this one. As I said on the Yahoo thread, I haHenry Volquardsen-1/8/1998
821 In Europe Yamanouchi I think did a comparison vs Zovirax and there all they neeluis a. garcia-1/8/1998
820 Henry we are just gonna have to stay in this one and see what develops... I am luis a. garcia-1/8/1998
819 <i>however the speculation is that BMY is in biz to make money for them nHenry Volquardsen-1/8/1998
818 To: chirodoc (433 ) From: Michael Corbley MCorbley-1/8/1998
817 Luis, didn't Lidak do a trial comparing Lidakol with Zovirax? I am trying M.LUTH-1/8/1998
816 I did but they did not know at that time... I think we may never get the exact luis a. garcia-1/8/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News