SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
ACT NETWORKS
An SI Board Since November 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2326 7 0 ANET
Emcee:  Ellison Ting Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
851 << It's refreshing to have people who have some actual(no matter how Chuck Agger-6/28/1997
850 Stan, Thanks. I had found those links, I thought that the actual report was tO-MY-O-6/28/1997
849 N.Z., You have got it right! Let's look at that 10Q. 80% growth in revenThomas J Smith-6/28/1997
848 Ed, it's the same info in Steve's post # 827. Go to Barrons' and pustan s.-6/28/1997
847 Fassil, I have been all over Barron's site and could not find anything abouO-MY-O-6/28/1997
846 this weekends barron. fbJake-6/28/1997
845 From the last 10Q, the company has a book value of $10.07, with over $7 in cashNIng Zhao-6/28/1997
844 Fassil, Can you give me a date for the Barrons article? Thanks.Thomas J Smith-6/28/1997
843 here is a summary of what wessel said - I do not think there is any doubt that Jake-6/28/1997
842 X208: Your advice sounds good. There are reasons for ANET being pounded. One Thomas J Smith-6/28/1997
841 People: Let us keep our heads at a cooler level here. I myself am heavily invX208-6/28/1997
840 No insider buying that I am aware of. I have seen some in PRMS and DGII. There Jeffrey L. Henken-6/28/1997
839 hmm, i said i would buy in the 11-13 range, and many of you said it would neverStock Guru-6/28/1997
838 1. Any insider buying on anet in the last few months. 2. Based on the mostBrad Rogers-6/28/1997
837 Give the guy(George) and Jan at IR a break. It's refreshing to have people Jeffrey L. Henken-6/27/1997
836 Wessels <b>did not</b> downgrade the stock from strong buy to buy, Steve Borg-6/27/1997
835 << Jan would love to buy at current levels she said>> Dont get me Chuck Agger-6/27/1997
834 Wessels, Arnold was one of the original underwriters of the IPO. Erickson has jr-6/27/1997
833 Spoke to Jan at IR. There are only two analyts following company, the H&Q George Elliott-6/27/1997
832 Andrew, so the Wessels coverage would be "new coverage"? Already, tBrad Rogers-6/27/1997
831 All, Here is the analyst recommendation I got from Zacks: Brokerage Firm wongd-6/27/1997
830 Mr. Ericksons e-mail address is terickson@wessels.com and Wessels, Arnold and O-MY-O-6/27/1997
829 I don't think I can stand any more of these types of buy recomendations. IO-MY-O-6/27/1997
828 Here is a recap of the conversation that I had with anet's investor relatioAndrew Q. Viet-6/27/1997
827 Here's a little more that's formatted a little better: Shares Of ACT NSteve Borg-6/27/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):