SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Complacency Indexes
An SI Board Since August 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1487 37 0
Emcee:  TechTrader42 Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
862Brooke, I happened to flip on some program other than cnbs last evening and therMonty Lenard-4/2/2002
861I misspoke earlier today, or more accurately, some of you may have misunderstoodTechTrader42-4/1/2002
860Here are the numbers: ST Naz CI: 97.098 99.154 MT Naz CI: 97.160 99.368 LT Naz TechTrader42-4/1/2002
859Where have all the bulls gone on the various threads today? It's disturbing.TechTrader42-4/1/2002
858Some solid research from Kevin Watson: funphone.comRick Faurot-4/1/2002
857Here are the scores: ST Naz CI: 69.891 99.154 MT Naz CI: 70.533 99.368 LT Naz CTechTrader42-4/1/2002
856I only notice when my neighbor rings the doorbell -g-Challo Jeregy-3/30/2002
855How did you guys know I often trade in my jammies, sometimes not even noticing iSusan G-3/29/2002
854O/T Brookelise, I'm curious to know the thread research department's tWilliam JH-3/29/2002
853I've had to disqualify your entry, Sherman, because it was submitted after tTechTrader42-3/29/2002
852takes to long to get into jammies .. saves time to just sleep in my clothes .. Gersh Avery-3/29/2002
851Sorry, can no longer afford pajamas or slippers due to loss of capital, but I doMichael Gaudet-3/29/2002
850I just woke up, do I win anything?Sherman Chen-3/28/2002
849I was hoping to get more contest entries, Triffin. But I suppose the gurus felt TechTrader42-3/28/2002
848ST Naz CI: 99.154 92.893 MT Naz CI: 99.368 94.761 LT Naz CI: 99.744 97.925 ST STechTrader42-3/28/2002
847Brookster .. I'm still in my 'jammies' But forgot to wear my slippeTriffin-3/28/2002
846ST Naz CI: 97.703 92.893 MT Naz CI: 98.285 94.761 LT Naz CI: 99.306 97.925 ST STechTrader42-3/28/2002
845The Complacency Index thread is pleased to announce its first contest for profesTechTrader42-3/28/2002
844ST Naz CI: 100.000 92.893 MT Naz CI: 100.000 94.761 LT Naz CI: 100.000 97.925 STechTrader42-3/28/2002
843JNPR is a prime example. They believe they can pro forma their earnings to 0 eaOral Roberts-3/28/2002
842In addition to the reduced expectations, earnings, if any, will be a few pennieWilliam JH-3/28/2002
841Not surprising, since all the expectations had been reduced so much. Now they caTechTrader42-3/28/2002
840ST Naz CI: 98.731 92.893 MT Naz CI: 99.065 94.761 LT Naz CI: 99.629 97.925 ST STechTrader42-3/28/2002
839FWIW, BOB WALBERG/BRIEFING ---- Says positive pre-announcements have exceeded neFrederick Langford-3/28/2002
838I don't know why people would be cautious about the Naz. What with the earniTechTrader42-3/28/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News