S1: Doing Business in a Dot Com Depression, -V1

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
S1: Doing Business in a Dot Com Depression, -V1

An SI Board Since October 1998

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
1013	26	0	SONE

Emcee: Kevin A. Lynch	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
863	Rob- to-days action may be the answer that you are looking for ! Being lon	Dowjoe	-	6/28/2000
862	Charlie, I guess the story at SONE is over and done with? I don't think s	Rob C.	-	6/26/2000
861	Rob: Jim Cramer wrote the following this morning. Timing is ironic: <i>	Charlie Smith	-	6/26/2000
860	Charlie, Surprised this didn't help any today? ATLANTA--(BUSINESS WIRE)--	Rob C.	-	6/26/2000
859	Bob, I had to buy more today, seems like the market has beat us up enough here	Rob C.	-	6/22/2000
858	Bob, I have to agree with you on this one. The analyst is an idiot. Just like	DJ Clancey	-	6/20/2000
857	Unfortunately, not cynical enough to sell more over 100. 1/8 of my position at	Oeconomicus	-	6/20/2000
856	<i>...more cynical than me.</i> Naaah...couldn't be! Hi Mark.	Charlie Smith	-	6/19/2000
855	Someone more cynical than me.	MGV	-	6/19/2000
854	The revised revenue projection is simply an excuse. Analysts are generally inca	Oeconomicus	-	6/19/2000
853	<i>"There must be more to it than that."</i> Part of it	MGV	-	6/19/2000
852	Doing some due-diligence on SONE. It's one I've been following. That i	Labrador	-	6/19/2000
851	$150 to $35?! LOL Where do you suppose this guy is thinking he adds value?	MGV	-	6/19/2000
850	R.D., Now the analysts are piling on in the other direction. No more 3 figure	tuck	-	6/19/2000
849	R.D., More or less as you said. No dividend. No floorless language. But no l	tuck	-	6/16/2000
848	Austin, Glad I wrote calls on the spike: biz.yahoo.com Cheers, Tuck	tuck	-	6/7/2000
847	Nice $6 point rally today - about time. Looking for great rewards from SONE.	Austin S.	-	6/5/2000
846	From this week's Killen report: <i>S1 Bankrolled S1 Corp., financial	Feathered Propeller	-	6/5/2000
845	Rob, Seemed like the right thing to do, I am in this morning at 33 5/16's.	Rob C.	-	6/2/2000
844	Tuck, if "no preferential dividend" means anything other than "n	Oeconomicus	-	6/1/2000
843	Rob, You're probably right about the dividend, assuming "no preferent	tuck	-	6/1/2000
842	Tuck, I think you are reading more into this than you should. First, there is	Oeconomicus	-	5/31/2000
841	Doug, <i>Overall, this looks to me not as a "need for cash" si	tuck	-	5/28/2000
840	Strategic investors often up their stakes during bear markets, when their large	Doug (Htfd,CT)	-	5/28/2000
839	R.D., S1 gets cash via converts: siliconinvestor.com S1 was going to be cash	tuck	-	5/28/2000

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):