2000-Year of the Biotechs! | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical
2000-Year of the Biotechs!

An SI Board Since December 1999

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
1142	41	0

Emcee: Arthur Radley	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
867	Greetings from Copenhagen! Been away for about 2 weeks and can't believe how	Arthur Radley	-	7/3/2000
866	I'm somewhere around 10% genomics stocks in my biotech portfolio, and 5% gen	Mike McFarland	-	7/3/2000
865	The reality of the situation is much closer than you might think. The discussion	Return to Sender	-	7/2/2000
864	(Engineering humans--Sports Center, heheh, let me know if they recommend any sto	Mike McFarland	-	7/2/2000
863	Advances always bring controversy. That's the nature of the beast. Personal	Torben Noerup Nielsen	-	7/2/2000
862	AMGN is truly the original Biotech success story and they do seem to be less lik	Return to Sender	-	7/2/2000
861	Genomics darkhorse: AMGN. Genomics the latest buzzword? How true. Something ve	opalapril	-	7/2/2000
860	The weekly close of BioMedTech stocks under $60 (BioBizNetIndex) has been posted	blackmerlin	-	7/2/2000
859	RTS, there is a thread that specializes in this area: Subject 34665 Two intere	Pseudo Biologist	-	7/2/2000
858	Updated: The Human Monoclonal Antibody Stocks seem worthy of discussion: These	Return to Sender	-	7/1/2000
857	One thing that I have noticed is that very few companies are above using the lat	Return to Sender	-	7/1/2000
856	I have to tell you NANO was a pretty good looking company! Here is one of the pr	Return to Sender	-	7/1/2000
855	Oops, meant to say NGEN (Nanogen). Here is the Yahoo! profile: biz.yahoo.com	Pseudo Biologist	-	7/1/2000
854	How does NANO figure into the mix? Is the company's technology being used to	Return to Sender	-	7/1/2000
853	Re. <i>Does anyone here see any glaring ommisions ...? </i> I'd	Pseudo Biologist	-	7/1/2000
852	Does anyone here see any glaring ommisions or mistakes on this list of Biotechno	Return to Sender	-	7/1/2000
851	TXB received formal FDA approval for its new drug. Not a surprise, but it seems	opalapril	-	6/30/2000
850	<OT> Cheer up, everybody. No one here has invested in Franklin Labs of Ra	opalapril	-	6/27/2000
849	RE: Oncolytics, I own SYBB, which has a 40% stake in Oncoloytics. SYBB has two	Starfish*	-	6/26/2000
848	Soros has a little action on CRGN too but you probably know that. Besides ownin	Madharry	-	6/26/2000
847	I have a legitimate question about the value of two biotech companies in CAnada	thebeach	-	6/25/2000
846	Biotechs did very well last week. The BioBizNet Index of BioMedTech Stocks, Tab	blackmerlin	-	6/25/2000
845	Blood(y) Battle Brewing? biz.yahoo.com	opalapril	-	6/22/2000
844	You people need to take this company seriously: THE TSE could be just a month a	thebeach	-	6/21/2000
843	When CALPERs speaks....http://cbs.marketwatch.com/archive/20000620/news/current	Arthur Radley	-	6/20/2000

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):