SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Boxing: The Sweet Science
An SI Board Since May 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
10490 32 0
Emcee:  LPS5 Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
8790i almost went to emeril's last time i was there...time just got away... i wMulhollandDrive-3/9/2003
8789I actually did pretty well. Not nearly enough to subsidize the entire vacation, LPS5-3/9/2003
8788:) i'm perfectly content to stand and watch as others pay homage to the houMulhollandDrive-3/9/2003
8787It sure does. Just ask the casinos that are splitting up everything I own, now..LPS5-3/9/2003
8786did you hear him saying the ref was "in the bag"?MulhollandDrive-3/9/2003
8785by that time you figure airfare, hotel, new wardrobe, shoes, tips....oh and tiMulhollandDrive-3/9/2003
8784No, not at all!LPS5-3/9/2003
8783you think i'm joking don't you? ;)MulhollandDrive-3/9/2003
8782Seriously, man. If you watch Stoney's lips and listen carefully to the corneLPS5-3/9/2003
8781LOL!!!!Jorj X Mckie-3/9/2003
8780Stoney is pathetic - that's the word for it. That kind of whining - every fiLPS5-3/9/2003
8779I was watching Jay Nady to see if he was overly officious. Where he did ding RuiJorj X Mckie-3/9/2003
8778LOL!LPS5-3/9/2003
8777Hey Bruce, If you were Jones' promoter/advisor, what would you advise next,LPS5-3/9/2003
8776Jones-Ruiz observations...... I thought the usually over-officious Jay Nady didBwe-3/9/2003
8775aaaiiiiieeeee... glad i held onto the $49.95... (socked it away in the barrerMulhollandDrive-3/9/2003
8774Agreed. And - as you said - in person, I may have had it 8-4, 9-3, something likLPS5-3/9/2003
8773it was better on TV:-)Jorj X Mckie-3/9/2003
8772i watched jones/ruiz last night, i hope that fight was more interesting in persoMulhollandDrive-3/9/2003
8771Shocker: Sanders KOs Klitschko! By Richard K. Redling, FightNews.com UnheraldeLPS5-3/9/2003
8770well, thinking marketing and selling the fight... if sanders wants a quick big pvds4-3/9/2003
8769My only recollection of Sanders prior to last night's stunning upset was wheBwe-3/9/2003
8768damn! Klitschko looks like the just took a 12 round beating. Sanders definitelJorj X Mckie-3/9/2003
8767at the fight, I had it as 8 to 4 RJJ. Seeing it on TV, I gave Jones 11 rounds. Jorj X Mckie-3/9/2003
8766No doubt about it - as I said here, in the third paragraph: Message 18674619 LLPS5-3/9/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News