SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
GZMO
An SI Board Since November 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
438 23 0 GZMO
Emcee:  mike mulhearn Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
88 Mike my point in using "non-scientist" is that despite the very compljeffbas-9/16/1999
87 *OT* <i>non-scientist</i> anybody else feel it is time to drop thMike McFarland-9/16/1999
86 Thanks, Stuart, I have now read it. However, as a non-scientist I still have nojeffbas-9/15/1999
85 You can obtain information on SAGE via their web site. genzyme.comsim1-9/15/1999
84 Rick, I noted the reco on ABSC because of its gene screening/research capabilitjeffbas-9/15/1999
83 Oh-Oh and here's Dendreon spending ALL that nice money. Gosh are they goinRWReeves-9/15/1999
82 >> This technology right now is garbage << I have Dr. Avigen'sscaram(o)uche-9/14/1999
81 Jeff: Chapman is trying to imply that he/she knows the nature and number of &qscaram(o)uche-9/14/1999
80 <They have been doing melanoma trials for a long time using the same technolLLCF-9/14/1999
79 Please explain then, since I am not a scientist. They have been doing melanoma jeffbas-9/14/1999
78 Gzmo is a tulip short Up on news that they will be doing phase I trials for anD. Chapman-9/14/1999
77 Note my summary of the investment case for GZMO on YAHOO. Credit to Rick for rejeffbas-9/13/1999
76 Thanks, Rick. SAGE had slipped my mind even though I remember commenting on it jeffbas-9/13/1999
75 Jeff: Yes, Science would be <i>just fine</i>. Today's rally..scaram(o)uche-9/13/1999
74 There are in my opinion at least 2 reasons for today's advance. The announcjeffbas-9/13/1999
73 check out Dayinvestor.com article on GZMO , they wrote it when stock was 3 1/2.StockReporter-9/13/1999
72 < SNAP.> Owned quite a bit based on the 'value' sheet [plus scieLLCF-9/13/1999
71 Sell some? Not me. Not yet. My strategy, get your own! - g - Love this Bioscaram(o)uche-9/13/1999
70 I haven't seen any news. Maybe it's people switching out of ENMD? I'Biomaven-9/13/1999
69 Holy skyrocket batman... can you say 300%???????????? Sell some or what? DAK LLCF-9/13/1999
68 Are their any implications from their willingness to finance these trials on brjeffbas-9/9/1999
67 GZMO into the clinic with breast cancer vaccine... story to follow. Didn't LLCF-9/9/1999
66 The deal possibly predated current mgmt. One of the things I thought interestinjeffbas-8/27/1999
65 Jeff: Correct.... everybody would have been paying to fund something that isscaram(o)uche-8/27/1999
64 Rick, note this (bad?) news: biz.yahoo.com What I do not understand is why thjeffbas-8/27/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News