Bill Wexler's Dog Pound | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech
Bill Wexler's Dog Pound

An SI Board Since March 1999

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
10293	141	0	REFR

Emcee: Bill Wexler	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
8818	<<<Foul language and pathetic attempts at humor won't change the fa	Bill Wexler	-	2/10/2003
8817	I'd rather have REFR publish an income statement with positive numbers. Did	Bill Ulrich	-	2/10/2003
8816	Bill, You admit that you don't trade alone. Your transactions do not cover	N. Dixon	-	2/10/2003
8815	Dang, this is sounding like the good ole times during the pennystock scam mania.	Jorj X Mckie	-	2/10/2003
8814	Securities fraud is very difficult to prove Bill. There is no way that the SEC	Mike M	-	2/10/2003
8813	Bill, He solicited investors on Yahoo and SI to contact him. He admits to pooli	N. Dixon	-	2/10/2003
8812	Foul language and pathetic attempts at humor won't change the fact that you	N. Dixon	-	2/10/2003
8811	Actually...the confirmations state "buy to cover" as do the original o	Bill Wexler	-	2/10/2003
8810	ZIXI has REFR beat, however - more than $10 per share in GAAP losses since their	Dale Baker	-	2/10/2003
8809	You gonna convict him of bad manners? Usually, you need to find a real crime, th	Bill Ulrich	-	2/10/2003
8808	A dollar sounds reasonable to me. However, if you are telling the truth about g	Bill Wexler	-	2/10/2003
8807	Bill, You could provide trade confirmations for long purchases and not for sho	N. Dixon	-	2/10/2003
8806	I think Bill has done much more "harassing" than I ever have. He uses	N. Dixon	-	2/10/2003
8805	Actually, here's the point I was getting at: Dixon keeps posting that site a	Bill Ulrich	-	2/10/2003
8804	Oh oh...look out Bill. Mike Moron is saying that you sound "defensive"	Bill Wexler	-	2/10/2003
8803	I absolutely agree. Where we disagree is in my confidence of your ability to di	Mike M	-	2/10/2003
8802	I've lost count of how many consecutive quarters of negative earnings REFR h	Bill Ulrich	-	2/10/2003
8801	You sound pretty defensive for someone not implicated. I made no allegations.	Mike M	-	2/10/2003
8800	So do a "GBICExposed!" site instead of harassing an individual investo	Bill Ulrich	-	2/10/2003
8799	How much you wanna bet that when the REFR and MTXX frauds finally become drill b	Bill Wexler	-	2/10/2003
8798	"If" this and "if" that. Whole lotta "ifs". "	Bill Ulrich	-	2/10/2003
8797	I see. So you would then agree that when penny-stock promoters spread false pos	Bill Wexler	-	2/10/2003
8796	Bill, if there is an organized effort to sell shares short and to fill the Inter	Mike M	-	2/10/2003
8795	<< do not think you have covered>> I have partially covered and wil	Bill Wexler	-	2/10/2003
8794	Bill, If it were just an innocent boxing of a position that would be one thing	N. Dixon	-	2/10/2003

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):