Bill Wexler's Dog Pound | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech
Bill Wexler's Dog Pound

An SI Board Since March 1999

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
10293	141	0	REFR

Emcee: Bill Wexler	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
8843	Name them	N. Dixon	-	2/10/2003
8842	With quite a few people on SI.	Jorj X Mckie	-	2/10/2003
8841	Well, like I said, I don't really know Bill. And if he trades from a clothin	Jorj X Mckie	-	2/10/2003
8840	Midland, If it weren't for shorts we'd trade less than 10K a day. You a	N. Dixon	-	2/10/2003
8839	<i>he has the reputation of having a fair amount of integrity. </i>	N. Dixon	-	2/10/2003
8838	Are you suggesting that Bill is a naked shorter?<g>	Mike M	-	2/10/2003
8837	I don't actually know Bill (Wexler that is). Know of him, and that he has th	Jorj X Mckie	-	2/10/2003
8836	Dang, looks like REFR may have invested in that software package.	Jorj X Mckie	-	2/10/2003
8835	Think your buddy has been spending too much time in the off shore world.	benchpress550	-	2/10/2003
8834	<i> Bill was so wrong about REFR, I suspect that REFR would have more reve	N. Dixon	-	2/10/2003
8833	Perhaps they have something like that one, it appears to work for centuries... M	RockyBalboa	-	2/10/2003
8832	Did Bill forget his cloths again?	Jorj X Mckie	-	2/10/2003
8831	If Bill was so wrong about REFR, I suspect that REFR would have more revenues.	Jorj X Mckie	-	2/10/2003
8830	That certainly could be effective against the honest "shorter" Jorj.	Mike M	-	2/10/2003
8829	They naked short them from Canadian accounts. REFR is already impossible to borr	N. Dixon	-	2/10/2003
8828	If investors take physical possession of their stock certificates, it takes thos	Jorj X Mckie	-	2/10/2003
8827	Why would they? ND	N. Dixon	-	2/10/2003
8826	My only question is, has the company told investors to call in the certs yet?	Jorj X Mckie	-	2/10/2003
8825	Hey, you know me, I'm just a chart chaser, don't know nothing about no f	Jorj X Mckie	-	2/10/2003
8824	2003	N. Dixon	-	2/10/2003
8823	Not to worry. Nobody is selling, remember? Everything will be fine. When's e	Bill Ulrich	-	2/10/2003
8822	Bill, Get an education on the glass industry and how long it takes for an new t	N. Dixon	-	2/10/2003
8821	Class reunion at the Dog Pound. Hey — what's that floating in the punch bowl	Bill Ulrich	-	2/10/2003
8820	Bill, Yes, you are quite amusing Bill. So amuse me and make a phone call to Lam	N. Dixon	-	2/10/2003
8819	Bill, <i>I'd rather have REFR publish an income statement with positi	N. Dixon	-	2/10/2003

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):