SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Discuss Year 2000 Issues
An SI Board Since July 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
9818 28 0
Emcee:  C.K. Houston Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
8918 Hey David... Saw your name pop up in Kipplinger's Y2K special... GuessHawkmoon-10/12/1999
8917 Karen, <i>I can't imagine anyone who has put even a little bit of enJim-10/12/1999
8916 Jim - <i>Suppose that some scientists were predicting that on a particulDavid Eddy-10/12/1999
8915 Tim A - <i>Anyone care to take a run at interpreting what this might meaDavid Eddy-10/12/1999
8914usatoday.com <b>News outlets prepare for Y2K coverage</B> SNIP: &lCheeky Kid-10/12/1999
8913 >>>I really think that people are convinced that there will be no majoLane3-10/12/1999
8912 re: >>Anyone care to take a run at interpreting what this might mean?<Jeff Mizer-10/12/1999
8911 Karen, you could be right - but consider this situation: Suppose that <i>Jim-10/12/1999
8910 Jim, the lack of discussion may be, as you say, because most people have decideLane3-10/12/1999
8909 I suspect it's because during the last year, there have been virtually no sJim-10/12/1999
8908 Here's some food for thought if you're hungry or a curiosity if you'Sawtooth-10/12/1999
8907 With thanks to Goldbug Guru: Y2K Stock Market Crash Survey stocks.about.com William Peavey-10/12/1999
8906year2000.com <b>Taking Y2K Too Seriously Contest </b> - - - - - -Cheeky Kid-10/12/1999
8905 April 14, 1999 year2000.com Prepare how ever long you want. I don't realCheeky Kid-10/12/1999
8904 Hey Cheeky, You ever read the <b> whole article</b> when you postRunner-10/12/1999
8903cnniw.newsreal.com@2@9@3@126&path=News/ <b>Thinking About Y2k? Here&#Cheeky Kid-10/11/1999
8902amcity.com <b>October disaster warnings overrated </b>Cheeky Kid-10/11/1999
8901 Off and on I've tried unsuccessfully to make a point about the differences Lane3-10/11/1999
8900 Retailers Getting Ready For New Year's Day Rush By JUDITH SCHOOLMAN DailLane3-10/11/1999
8899 Paraguay Is Playing Catch-Up on Y2K By Rajiv Chandrasekaran Washington Post SLane3-10/10/1999
8898 Aren't a lot of contingency plans " fix on failure "? We can onlRunner-10/10/1999
8897 Damn those global dependencies! currents.net Fair Use/etc... International Yflatsville-10/9/1999
8896zdnet.com October 8, 1999 <b>What Will Happen: Insurance </b> SNIPCheeky Kid-10/8/1999
8895zdnet.com October 8, 1999 <b>One glitch does not another make </b> Cheeky Kid-10/8/1999
8894 <i>Ron, just as we can always count on some people to make the gloomiest Hawkmoon-10/6/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News