SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
WCOM
An SI Board Since July 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
11568 152 0 WCOM
Emcee:  Paul Berggren Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
8943thanks June, At $2.40 in dividends, the yield is close to 21%. That's a tacampe-11/14/2001
8942MCIT paid $0.60 on 10/15/01. The next dividend has been declared. <i> CLIJune-11/13/2001
8941Anyone have the scoop on the MCIT div? Yahoo has it at $2.40 with $0.60 per qtrcampe-11/13/2001
8940"Tuesday October 16, 12:00 pm Eastern Time RESEARCH ALERT-Lehman cuts WorldOeconomicus-10/17/2001
8939WCOM looked strong this last week. After $15, it shouldn't take too much vocampe-9/29/2001
8938Whatever your smoking pass it around! sic.waldemar cyranski-9/25/2001
8937SBC is one the strongest in telecom index,so it's logic speculation, that ifel paradisio-9/25/2001
8936why SBC's movement has anything to do with WCOM? Are you speculating buyout zyx1996-9/25/2001
8935I think,the pullback to 13.50-14 will happen so I'm not in rush to add new pel paradisio-9/25/2001
8934wcom is on its way back to 60hdl-9/25/2001
8933Nice volume on the reversal Friday and very good volume today. 54 million sharesOeconomicus-9/25/2001
8932Well,I had bullish readings since few weeks. WCOM positive cash flow is unique iel paradisio-9/25/2001
8931Yes. Assuming nothing bad happens in the next 30 min, this will give us two daysOeconomicus-9/25/2001
8930WCOM might be the Nasdaq leader...breakout today. elel paradisio-9/25/2001
8929<Isn't this eerily reminiscent of Schaeffer at PSI? > For Bernie Yes. BWAC-9/8/2001
8928Isn't this eerily reminiscent of Schaeffer at PSI? Article this past week iAllen Furlan-9/8/2001
8927More - telecom articles: news.ft.com msnbc.comc.hinton-9/5/2001
8926nytimes.com Any thoughts on how wcom might be effected?c.hinton-9/3/2001
8925<i>BTW in real news WCOM says today it is reducing it cap-ex budget for neOeconomicus-8/29/2001
8924<at least the leverage gives him extra incentive to improve shareholder valueBWAC-8/29/2001
8923Thanks. Seems Bernie's a bit over leveraged. It'd be particularly painfuOeconomicus-8/29/2001
8922RD, sorry not 10Q, It was 10K. Page 82. ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATBWAC-8/29/2001
8921rrufff, Sorry it was actually in the 10K. Relevant passage is below: "SiBWAC-8/29/2001
8920BWAC, does that stand for Big Wigs Are Crooks? ;-) BTW, it's a long 10Q. CaOeconomicus-8/29/2001
8919In the 10Q filed with the SEC. Bernie, through WCOM, has personally borrowed subBWAC-8/29/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):