SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
QUANTUM
An SI Board Since March 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
9124 27 0 QNTM
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
8949 Lutz, but if it was such a sure thing, MCDC would be higher. No? G. [end] Gottfried-6/8/1999
8948 <<0,489 Quantum shares @ 21,125$ are worth 10,33$. As MCDC closed 7Z Analyzer-6/8/1999
8947 Gottfried, 0,489 Quantum shares @ 21,125$ are worth 10,33$. As MCDC closed 7Lutz Moeller-6/8/1999
8946 dav, some say it was the Barron's article. Message 10017253 G. Gottfried-6/7/1999
8945 any thoughts why QNTM went up after the warning ? thx eom dav-6/7/1999
8944 Lutz, cbs.marketwatch.com G. Gottfried-6/7/1999
8943 Sam, I missed the Quantum - Meriden Data takeover news. Where should I look? Lutz Moeller-6/7/1999
8942 I disagree, Quantum is not defying tech or fundy analysis. Fundamentally it isGreg Jung-6/7/1999
8941 Didn't you read the article in Barrons (also posted on this thread see siliSam-6/7/1999
8940 Tech, I'm amazed, too. RDRT is also humming. Just had a couple of 20k tradeGottfried-6/7/1999
8939 Whats going on with this stock?? Something is FISHY. After a bad earnings pre-aTechMeister-6/7/1999
8938 Myron, Quote.com shows QNTM near the top of the 'trade rate' list. I doGottfried-6/7/1999
8937 You gotta just love QNTM ! It seems that QNTM defies both Fundamentals and TecMYRON Z.-6/7/1999
8936 Re: Drop of less than 3% is a jolt? I thought the same thing. If that's ajohn dodson-6/5/1999
8935 << I challenge the participants to put all of these things into objeZ Analyzer-6/5/1999
8934 You've been holding since 1995? That year was the first time I had ever heaWill Cunningham-6/5/1999
8933 Thanks for posting the Barrons story. Sounds like Z or LK talking to me. HowevSam-6/5/1999
8932 Here's something curious to think about. Quantum preannounced at the end ofWill Cunningham-6/5/1999
8931 From recent Barron's: Continued troubles in the disc-drive market are hurWill Cunningham-6/5/1999
8930 Thanks for the response. I hear you, but I still can't get over the stocks Gregory Seward-6/5/1999
8929 Sam, biased reporting by CBS market watch... ><i>IRVINE, Calif. (CBS.Gottfried-6/5/1999
8928 Don't know if this will do it, by Robby Stevens just reiterated their buy oSam-6/4/1999
8927 I don't really know what arrangements have been made, but I imagine its theSam-6/4/1999
8926 I must admit, I'm amazed that this stock did not crater today. I've plaGregory Seward-6/4/1999
8925 Sam, A question regarding the split of QNTM into DSSG & HSSG. If we assuDebt Free-6/4/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News