Discuss Year 2000 Issues | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
Discuss Year 2000 Issues

An SI Board Since July 1997

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
9818	28	0

Emcee: C.K. Houston	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
8968	>>><i>...I hear it asked for a priest.<<<</i> In	flatsville	-	10/20/1999
8967	Well, I hear that IBM just met estimates excluding gains, but said "they w	flatsville	-	10/20/1999
8966	Hey little bearcup so nice of you to think of me<VBG> Still playing watc	Puna	-	10/20/1999
8965	Great detective work Karen!	Jim	-	10/19/1999
8964	>>>The guide is introduced with a letter from Pennsylvania Lt. Governo	Lane3	-	10/19/1999
8963	Pennsylvania seems to be a prudent state- of course nobody reads or follows the	Jeff Mizer	-	10/19/1999
8962	Mark--Thanks for the find...Remember my post re Unisys? Message 11550040 I the	flatsville	-	10/19/1999
8961	zdnet.com <b>What Will Happen: Electric power and energy </b> SNIP	Cheeky Kid	-	10/19/1999
8960	zdnet.com <b>The spooks and the news</b> SNIP: <i>>>Sa	Cheeky Kid	-	10/19/1999
8959	Check out in England Y-2K news. !/3 of all major companies have experienced p	Runner	-	10/19/1999
8958	news.excite.com	JBTFD	-	10/19/1999
8957	anything you post publically, including public threats, on this or any other th	bearcub	-	10/18/1999
8956	Cheryl, You are conspicuous by your absence. Any new research to share? Bill	William Peavey	-	10/18/1999
8955	Don't post to me. Any discussion with you is a waste of bandwith.	flatsville	-	10/18/1999
8954	B'ub, <i>no back up electric generators for operating the plutonium	Jim	-	10/17/1999
8953	and i don't appreciate you glossing over the nuclear disaster potential str	bearcub	-	10/17/1999
8952	and you are threatening me because...? because i am not impressed with your sh	bearcub	-	10/17/1999
8951	With any kind of luck my friend, we won't have to put up with you much long	flatsville	-	10/15/1999
8950	Making Money on Y2K:	Lane3	-	10/15/1999
8949	Hey B'ub, I don't appreciate being called arrogant! J'm	Jim	-	10/15/1999
8948	yes, i was referring to you. i just didn't want to type out flatsville, so	bearcub	-	10/15/1999
8947	I can't remember who it was directed to. RE: #reply-11562397 <i>To	Cheeky Kid	-	10/15/1999
8946	Cheeky, who said this about us. I cannot see which message you are replying to?	Jim	-	10/15/1999
8945	Hi, bearcub, you're in rare form today. Borderline coherent and downright	Lane3	-	10/15/1999
8944	Hey, we thought you went into hibernation. Some on this thread indeed are typi	foobert	-	10/15/1999

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):