SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Discuss Year 2000 Issues
An SI Board Since July 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
9818 28 0
Emcee:  C.K. Houston Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
8993 Ron-- Thanks for definition and link. You should email it to the register. Tflatsville-10/26/1999
8992 Herstatt Risk: contingencyanalysis.com "A famous example of settlement rHawkmoon-10/26/1999
8991 Thanks for the post... Transportation, energy, insurance, emergency services: aTD-10/25/1999
8990theregister.co.ukflatsville-10/25/1999
8989 flatsville - <i>Didn't they say that back in the 1960s as well in reDavid Eddy-10/23/1999
8988 Cheeky - <i>But, don't you think will advancing technology we are goDavid Eddy-10/23/1999
8987cnniw.newsreal.com@2@7@3@605 Fair Use/etc... Southeast Asian countries showingflatsville-10/23/1999
8986 From csy2k on the 10/13/99 meeting of WDCY2K (no deja.com link available yet) flatsville-10/23/1999
8985 OK...Allright...Too old to care perhaps. (We'll be about the same age, butflatsville-10/22/1999
8984 Hey speak for yourself! I'll be a spry 82 years old in 2038. Should I staHoward Clark-10/22/1999
8983 Howard-- I have no idea...Anyway, you're talking to the dead. <ggg>flatsville-10/22/1999
8982kiyoinc.com Hamasaki's latest..... Cheeky will say its nothing.... somJeff Mizer-10/22/1999
8981 An update on Congressional testimony courtesy of the LSI thread. Message 11675Lane3-10/22/1999
8980 Something I've always wondered is: Why didn't the designers of Unix maHoward Clark-10/22/1999
8979 Go argue with someone who cares... I'll be dead...deAD...DEAD!!! GET IT??flatsville-10/22/1999
8978 You can NOT compare the pace of technology then, to the pace NOW. 40 Years froCheeky Kid-10/22/1999
8977 Tim-- See: merlyn.demon.co.uk From the above web page: Fair Comment/etc... flatsville-10/22/1999
8976 Tim--Think Unix architecture. I'll try to find an article which lays out tflatsville-10/22/1999
8975 When some programs terminate. I think Quicken 99 is not supported after that dCheeky Kid-10/22/1999
8974 I am serious, Cheeky; what's with the 2038 - 2039 stuff? Sawtooth-10/22/1999
8973 LOL Cheeky Kid-10/22/1999
8972 << But then we have to go through this cr@p again in what 2038-39? >&gSawtooth-10/22/1999
8971 Mark--Re: NPR over the past year or so I've noticed their y2k reporting hasflatsville-10/22/1999
8970 From the market's response to IBM and others who have mentioned possible y2JBTFD-10/21/1999
8969nytimes.com October 21, 1999 Passivity Is the Word on Year 2000 Lane3-10/21/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):