SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Copper Fox
An SI Board Since February 2011
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10654 112 0 CUU
Emcee:  louel Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
9029If teck decides to proceed we should be worth at leave 250 million If not thenCUUallin11/4/2015
9028..hindsight is so fucking clearMetacomet11/4/2015
9027I give a lot of you a lot of credit for sticking it out..Not sure if credit the specboy201211/4/2015
9026What do we have to look forward to now. I guess we hope its worth it for teCUUallin-1/4/2015
9025Elmer has been a terrible CEO for this company in myopinion. what has he done fUnderhill69-1/4/2015
9024They needed more than one core to prove up the waste. I won't defend him wimudguy-1/4/2015
9023Have any guesses as to why they were shooting holes into a half dozen different Metacomet11/4/2015
9022A very good reference article to add to my collection. The section on optimizatiexplorationguy11/4/2015
9021I'm not going to repeat myself, I have explained it before in detail. Suffimudguy21/4/2015
9020Well, I'll let people interpret that relationship as they will. I think it mudguy-1/4/2015
9019They continue to use Moose Mountain I guess Elmer is a big fanMetacomet-1/4/2015
9018Can anyone confirm if the pit slope is creating the issue in this being called wCUUallin-1/4/2015
9017Hole 432 is not at depth. Maybe they don't drill because it will be proceCUUallin-1/4/2015
9016Correct me if I am wrong, is CUU using the same firm that did the SC PFS for themudguy-1/4/2015
9015I disagree with your claim- there is much more to this issue than just hitting smudguy-1/4/2015
9014We Know for a fact some or a large portion of the 171 mt of inferred can be upgrCUUallin-1/4/2015
9013Or, if you accept that Elmer is just an employee doing what they told him to do.sense31/4/2015
9012Thank you for posting that article Sense. Best read I've had in a long timeTheotokos11/4/2015
9011 Most people who piss away $90 million of others money might expect it will costMetacomet-1/4/2015
9010This popped up yesterday on the SI board for another company I follow: RPA'sense91/4/2015
9009So who is right? Louel says there is little waste to prove up and Riskee says aHog Head-1/4/2015
9008You're getting the "over burden" mixed up with the "171 milliRiskkee21/3/2015
9007This is a picture I took back in the winter of 2008. Its the Bob Quin Airportlouel-1/3/2015
9006..which brings me back to my primary complaint The BFS, in the body of the docuMetacomet11/3/2015
9005If the business case can be made then they will take action. According to the FSexplorationguy11/3/2015
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News