SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
WCOM
An SI Board Since July 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
11568 152 0 WCOM
Emcee:  Paul Berggren Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
9118I guess you do get your material from Lord Byron. You even copy his style and taOeconomicus-2/5/2002
9117Gee, Rob, I think I've already covered all his screwy arguments right here, Oeconomicus-2/5/2002
9116"Real assets are probably 100 times the size of GX" Be specific. what Rob S.-2/5/2002
91151st they lumped worldcom into the same heap as global crossing. Real assets are mad dog from over there-2/5/2002
9114Here is the article . . . I think this is credited with adding to the downside iRob S.-2/5/2002
9113Message #9059 from RKHIII at Feb 4, 2002 9:52 PM "(how do you lose 183 mimad dog from over there-2/5/2002
9112From WorldCom -Setting the Facts Straight As you read in Bernie Ebbers' e-mmad dog from over there-2/5/2002
9111<i>...recent analysis from an MSNBC columnist that portrayed WCOM as neverOeconomicus-2/5/2002
9110Geez it's hard to type after catching all these falling knives. Hit the butSofaSpud-2/5/2002
9109What I can't understand is how much might be off-balance sheet or otherwise Rob S.-2/5/2002
9108When will WCOM at $5? May be in 5 more days? I'm buying it there.Softechie-2/5/2002
9107We know that the revenue side looks weak. I don't see how they could buck tRob S.-2/5/2002
9106Shares! <GGG> Not enough $$$ to double my original investment!! ~SB~SecularBull-2/5/2002
9105A pig can never be Kosher.... OK, so I got your point.... At anyrate, there'Marty Rubin-2/5/2002
9104this pig may not be kosherhdl-2/5/2002
9103great point. Seems I remember S&P saying a debt downgrade was "nonsenHH-2/5/2002
9102<i>But I just can't say because who can figure out companies like WorlOeconomicus-2/5/2002
9101I'ts bound to be pretty ugly but should now be factored in. I honestly don&Rob S.-2/5/2002
9100could be some nasty news when they announce HHHH-2/5/2002
9099My only hope for this pig is to trade it. I can't tell if they have a trustRob S.-2/5/2002
9098You may be right. Then again, our hopes may be Daschled.<g>Oeconomicus-2/5/2002
9097I bought back. This thing is nerve racking . . . it hurts in my gut to buy it .Rob S.-2/5/2002
9096Some big green volume bars at 6.9-7.0. Let's see if that keeps up and burnsRob S.-2/5/2002
9095Amazing. The cuts will heal. I think.Oeconomicus-2/5/2002
9094>>>IMPORTANT INFO FOR WCOM INVESTORS<<< as many of you guys kBrasco One-2/5/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News