SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Bill Wexler's Dog Pound
An SI Board Since March 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10293 141 0 REFR
Emcee:  Bill Wexler Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
9168What do you mean "his job is defending." He did go after Asensio. Why N. Dixon-2/18/2003
9167I believe that "billwexler" is your spammer. I just reply. SubjectN. Dixon-2/18/2003
9166<i>They [REFR] don't want to be libel...</i> And you worked in Hoatzin-2/18/2003
9165I'm all for seeing more activity on this thread but 58 posts in one day withHank-2/18/2003
9164You seem to be missing the point. Taking action against Asensio would not be paKevin Podsiadlik-2/18/2003
9163<i>Sounds like the man REFR needs. </i> Yes, indeed. I noticed thatN. Dixon-2/18/2003
9162<I>Aaron Marcu, a partner in New York, is the Coordinator of the Firm'Kevin Podsiadlik-2/18/2003
9161Re:<<i>I see in this story that Asensio has a suit. I bet you also own Mike M-2/18/2003
9160<i>As a federal prosecutor in the U.S. Attorney's Office for the SouthN. Dixon-2/18/2003
9159Looks like he acts as REFR's corporate attorney, REFR being too cheap to hirKevin Podsiadlik-2/18/2003
9158BUYING SEBLBill Wexler-2/18/2003
9157usatoday.com I see in this story that Asensio has a suit. I bet you also own awho cares?-2/18/2003
9156I remain bullish on U.S. stocks. I see no point in bothering to short <i>Bill Wexler-2/18/2003
9155You're right Mike. He's already so off-topic on REFR that I've aboutN. Dixon-2/18/2003
9154Nancy, don't get Bill started on Sir John.Mike M-2/18/2003
9153<i>Robert Flaherty = paid whore for stock frauds</i> Now there'N. Dixon-2/18/2003
9152Message 16816840 Why don't you contact Mr. Marcu, the attorney that was copN. Dixon-2/18/2003
9151You still don't get it, do you? <I>Because it is a criminal offense. Kevin Podsiadlik-2/18/2003
9150Jury Verdict in CCSI trial: We, the jury, unanimously find: (1) Did plaintiff N. Dixon-2/18/2003
9149Excerpted from report of Robert W. Lowry dated January 31, 2001, RL Consulting SN. Dixon-2/18/2003
9148<i> why REFR never tried to press charges against Asensio</i> BecauN. Dixon-2/18/2003
9147Since you are rolling in REFR cash now, take a look at RGLD. I am short from 26 Dale Baker-2/18/2003
9146The REFR stock fraud... <b>"olsok" - a retrospective</b> Bill Wexler-2/18/2003
9145Robert Flaherty = paid whore for stock frauds: [Robert Flaherty's "EquBill Wexler-2/18/2003
9144It's all part of the cabal, you know. TED came up to meet us in SF. Me and KBill Ulrich-2/18/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News