SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
WCOM
An SI Board Since July 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
11568 152 0 WCOM
Emcee:  Paul Berggren Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
9168The VIX indicator, which tracts the degree of volatility in the market, was at aRob S.-2/6/2002
9167WorldCom At New Low Tuesday In 6th Day Of Heavy Trading 06 Feb 08:15 By JoSoftechie-2/6/2002
9166They probably won't be reassuring compared to the forecasts that are out theRob S.-2/6/2002
9165That was interesting to watch. I was just watching David Rocker talk on CNBC aboOeconomicus-2/6/2002
9164It's a volume reversal alright but whether it is a "key volume reversalRob S.-2/6/2002
9163Stocks where run up on rumour and hype why should they not be run down in the sac.hinton-2/6/2002
9162The Next Pitch: WorldCom reports its fourth-quarter earnings tomorrow. If they aHH-2/6/2002
9161Perhaps he heard a voice saying "don't go to the light!" ;-) A huOeconomicus-2/6/2002
9160"Doctor, the patient appears to have broken the fever. He is still weak anRob S.-2/6/2002
9159I have to talk to my floor broker - he never gave Warburg as a size seller - unlTerry D-2/6/2002
9158I have been pretty well glued to WCOM and a couple other stocks this morning. WRob S.-2/6/2002
9157I took the plunge - the volume was roaring at 11:20 - look at the minute chart -Terry D-2/6/2002
9156Of course I've considered it. I consider it highly improbable. Last Q, BTW,Oeconomicus-2/6/2002
9155Have you considered the possibility that the payout might be just plain gone?sea_biscuit-2/6/2002
9154Rob, had my finger on the trigger at six, but decided to buy more MIR instead. TOeconomicus-2/6/2002
9153I agree. Investors don't know what WCOM's "assets" are worth Rob S.-2/6/2002
9152If you have been short why worry? Face it, that was the side to be on until nowRob S.-2/6/2002
9151But do the sounder players (who?) in the carrier space have access to the capitaPete Young-2/6/2002
9150This is not new either. We once had a glut of sattelite capacity, BR's, andwillcousa-2/6/2002
9149Not to state the obvious, but the basic problem with the industry (perhaps overrPete Young-2/6/2002
9148For a dividend yield of >21%. Hell, whack the payout in half and it's stiOeconomicus-2/6/2002
9147Watch MCIT now below 9.50, about 25% dividend, and market cap is now 1/2 of EBITBWAC-2/6/2002
9146I don't know - short it, spread several rumors, driving it down to where BACOeconomicus-2/6/2002
9145We aren't dealing with the sane.....BWAC-2/6/2002
9144Still searching for support. Do you think anyone sane would want to stay short gOeconomicus-2/6/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News