Bill Wexler's Dog Pound | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech
Bill Wexler's Dog Pound

An SI Board Since March 1999

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol	SI Sentiment
10293	141	0	REFR	★★★★★ (Strong Buy)

Emcee: Bill Wexler	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
9193	Well then how do you explain the fact that, particularly during the bubble era,	Kevin Podsiadlik	-	2/23/2003
9192	<i>Naked short selling has the prospect of creating an unlimited stock flo	N. Dixon	-	2/22/2003
9191	<<<i>In any case, the article proceeds along in a lame fashion, talk	Mike M	-	2/22/2003
9190	The wheels of justice turn slowly but they are turning. More investors are fed u	N. Dixon	-	2/22/2003
9189	An old friend of SI, Bill Fleckenstein weighs in on the shorting debate: <B&	Kevin Podsiadlik	-	2/22/2003
9188	That is, indeed, hilarious news. Variations of it have been going around the web	Bill Ulrich	-	2/21/2003
9187	Message 18613270	N. Dixon	-	2/21/2003
9186	<<Much like the REFR and MTXX (GUMM) stock frauds...those companies were i	Mike M	-	2/21/2003
9185	<i>Much like the REFR and MTXX (GUMM) stock frauds...those companies were	N. Dixon	-	2/21/2003
9184	FWIW, RGLD isn't a mining stock; they have a couple of royalty streams they	Dale Baker	-	2/21/2003
9183	I don't believe SEBL is a one trick pony. In fact, I have the utmost faith	Bill Wexler	-	2/20/2003
9182	<i>BUYING SEBL </i> Why? I'm not trying to be factious Just	chojiro	-	2/20/2003
9181	<i>your leaps of logic are impressive</i> One doesn't have to &	N. Dixon	-	2/19/2003
9180	No, we just see to what lengths a desperate Bill Wexler goes in trying to cover	N. Dixon	-	2/19/2003
9179	<i>PR Newswire has published MOUNTAINS of false information, and has never	N. Dixon	-	2/19/2003
9178	<I>PR Newswire doesn't want to be responsible for publishing false inf	Kevin Podsiadlik	-	2/19/2003
9177	So apparently we're supposed to believe that the author of that site feels d	Kevin Podsiadlik	-	2/19/2003
9176	your leaps of logic are impressive. your poor husband, if he doesn't beat y	oldirtybastard	-	2/19/2003
9175	Lawyers specialize but that doesn't mean they limit their practice. Marcu wa	N. Dixon	-	2/19/2003
9174	Bill Wexler Revisited ________________________________________________________	N. Dixon	-	2/19/2003
9173	I guess "KVELEZ" doesn't know Dick Tracy is a fictional character?	Kevin Podsiadlik	-	2/19/2003
9172	<I>What do you mean "his job is defending."</I> Which of	Kevin Podsiadlik	-	2/19/2003
9171	Just use the Ignore button and the number of posts drops dramatically. The shee	Dale Baker	-	2/19/2003
9170	Yahoo! Message Boards: PLMD Report Abuse Letter I Sent To USA Today Part 1 by	N. Dixon	-	2/18/2003
9169	It was a misspelling. It should be "liable." I'm busy and sometime	N. Dixon	-	2/18/2003

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):