SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
WCOM
An SI Board Since July 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
11568 152 0 WCOM
Emcee:  Paul Berggren Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
9193cbs.marketwatch.com;matt dillabough-2/7/2002
9192Thanks for the link about Bernie's letter. Now it's really getting to beeric ross-2/7/2002
9191Against those are ranged generally high consumer debt,Fed gov back into deficit,c.hinton-2/7/2002
9190I don't see SBC or any of the Bells buying WCOM. It would take almost two yjohn-2/6/2002
9189I heard a letter had gone out to employees and it sounds similear, but we will omarginmike-2/6/2002
9188<i>Do you think those two encouraging letters are real?</i> The secElsewhere-2/6/2002
9187Do you think those two encouraging letters are real ? HHHH-2/6/2002
9186Just checked a/h prices-$6.56bob oserin-2/6/2002
9185Agree. Not manipulation. Investors making decisions about keeping the stock anMJ-2/6/2002
9184I looked at max pain for the February expirations and that will optimize anywherwillcousa-2/6/2002
9183This would be an excellent time to sell puts. Worldcom was upgraded from holdRob S.-2/6/2002
9182Here are two Ebbers letters to WCOM employees: messages.yahoo.com messages.yahooElsewhere-2/6/2002
9181i can tell you from my own recent experience that the pattern is similar to KMarshortilong-2/6/2002
9180Because I want to believe! Here come the black helicopters. Not just one buyerTerry D-2/6/2002
9179No response yet from WCOM despite the price collapse.It seems the management caneric ross-2/6/2002
9178But why attribute to anything more than the sum of traders actions? That is allRob S.-2/6/2002
9177I don't know - depends where they mark the ball. This should have closed in Terry D-2/6/2002
9176No, just trading action . . . too much volume to be manipulation . . just wise tRob S.-2/6/2002
9175someone is painting this closeTerry D-2/6/2002
9174And we are coming in for the close . . not moving as high as I thought early thiRob S.-2/6/2002
9173Before we get a significant market bottom the breath of selling needs to widen .Rob S.-2/6/2002
9172Yes I bought- i didnt mortage the house but I put my money where my mouth is andmad dog from over there-2/6/2002
9171Obviously you are buying . "people selling today are makc.hinton-2/6/2002
9170Rob, it's interesting that you would mention the divergence in early 2000 beOeconomicus-2/6/2002
9169this isnt rumor its gross misinformation and baseless innuendo. The people selmad dog from over there-2/6/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News