SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Bill Wexler's Dog Pound
An SI Board Since March 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol SI Sentiment
10293 141 0 REFR ★★★★★ (Strong Buy)
Emcee:  Bill Wexler Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
9318Oh didn't you know, all people named Mike Wilkins are the same person. WaitKevin Podsiadlik-3/9/2003
9317Wait, wait, I must have missed something! Is it established that Mike Wilkins tHoatzin-3/9/2003
9316<I>If this technology was so compelling, then it is much less understandabHoatzin-3/9/2003
9315Dixon <i> Should have done your homework instead of going off on wild goosRockyBalboa-3/9/2003
9314With the progress that was announced on March 6, 2003, not one investor need be N. Dixon-3/9/2003
9313<i> What is certain, however, is that H-P's success in getting a patenN. Dixon-3/9/2003
9312Hello, Bill, for a yearly quick check see: biz.yahoo.com it appears that it iRockyBalboa-3/9/2003
9311Whether SPD has a profitable future remains uncertain. What is certain, however,Bill Ulrich-3/9/2003
9310Okay, then let's talk about SPD vs. other light control technologies. Read tN. Dixon-3/8/2003
9309Still trotting out that Mike Wilkins thing &#151 film producer, actor, traveBill Ulrich-3/8/2003
9308Don't tell me, we own an escort service in Florida and have secret ties to AN. Dixon-3/8/2003
9307messages.yahoo.comBill Wexler-3/8/2003
9306<i>Sure, here you go...</i> Your link contained falsehoods not infoN. Dixon-3/7/2003
9305For years, REFR shills have been screaming that they're "not selling&quBill Wexler-3/7/2003
9304<<can anyone point to a post they have made that has any information?>&Bill Wexler-3/7/2003
9303Re: RKronemann by: l1660 03/07/03 03:44 pm Msg: 133551 of 133561 <<NewN. Dixon-3/7/2003
9302Oh...I should also point out one more thing... I made a lot of money shorting GBill Wexler-3/7/2003
9301We also know the following about "N Dixon" 1) "Her" real naBill Wexler-3/7/2003
9300Wexler truth meter by: aa116000 Long-Term Sentiment: Strong Buy 03/07/03 01:00N. Dixon-3/7/2003
9299Midland writes: <i>Meanwhile, REFR heading lower.</i> But we know N. Dixon-3/7/2003
9298Oh. I have occasionally debookmarked Bill Wexlers thread and missed all the fun.RockyBalboa-3/7/2003
9297<i>3) Why were company funds used to purchase the services of at least oneJustTradeEm-3/7/2003
9296Questions for "ASK JOE" Reccently, Joe Harary, the corrupt attorney tBill Wexler-3/7/2003
9295Message 18668892N. Dixon-3/7/2003
9294I've been covering. On the other hand, I tend to be early. I'm also faBill Wexler-3/7/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):