SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
ocom breakthrough technology
An SI Board Since April 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
994 11 0 OCOM
Emcee:  james nowak Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
944 8-K filed with results of the offering. They raised $12.6 million (net of fees)dumbmoney-6/18/1999
943 You may be right.However the numbers as I read them in the latest filing give mtelephonics-6/18/1999
942 telephonics, I think you are mistaken. Here's how the arithmetic works onQ.-6/18/1999
941 You are correct in the stated requirement to coninue thier listing. If you willtelephonics-6/17/1999
940 OCOM's secondary units are trading with the ticker symbol OCOMU quote.yahoRajiv-6/16/1999
939 Your numbers are correct. I also wonder what other debts will be satisfied fromtelephonics-6/9/1999
938 <i>It wasn't clear to me whether they are selling their shares as pardumbmoney-6/8/1999
937 I read the new filings. The units are as you described: 3 shares of common plusQ.-6/8/1999
936 I noticed the underwriter fee has increased to $2.4 million, or 16% of the offedumbmoney-6/7/1999
935 They filed with the SEC today forms SB-2/A,8-A12G and RW. All who are potentialtelephonics-6/7/1999
934 well, if it doesn't close this week, then what? They don't have much caQ.-6/7/1999
933 SECONDARY TO CLOSE THIS WEEK???telephonics-6/7/1999
932 SEC filing has yet to be done. telephonics-6/4/1999
931 telephonics, where did you learn about this change in the secondary? It doesn&Q.-6/3/1999
930 Terms of secondary have changed again. Now a unit consists of 3 shares of stocktelephonics-6/2/1999
929 Can thew Vidphone interface with IP. If not,with the rapidly growing capabilitytelephonics-5/29/1999
928 A federal court has ruled that the FCC had not adequately explained its decisiotelephonics-5/24/1999
927 E mail me to okk7826@aol.comoki kwon-5/22/1999
926 I certainly agree with you. telephonics-5/22/1999
925 Fine.Prove it???? telephonics-5/22/1999
924 <i> Why is that so? </i> My guess is that the underwriters have tRajiv-5/21/1999
923 That is not true. They have enough brokers and heard that interest is strong duoki kwon-5/21/1999
922 Could it be that the underwriters have failed to get sufficient institutional ctelephonics-5/21/1999
921 Why is that so? oki kwon-5/21/1999
920 This is a sure sign of trouble. I have never seen a Nasdaq-listed company issueRajiv-5/21/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News