SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Network Appliance
An SI Board Since April 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10934 322 0 NTAP
Emcee:  Lynn Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
9459<i>Don't look now...</i> Worse...I looked at afterhours and it BirdDog-11/8/2001
9458re: Doh!!!!!!!!...Just had to open my big mouth If you're going to prognostJacob Snyder-11/8/2001
9457Don't look now, but the 16.15 support level is history. You might want to rUncle Frank-11/8/2001
9456Look at that support! The last high line at $16.15 is continuing to show strongBirdDog-11/8/2001
9455OT re QCOM: You guys are splitting hairs. 1. they didn't warn for the nextJacob Snyder-11/8/2001
9454<<Amazing, given their warning, that the stock is up. QCOM didn't warim a survivor-11/8/2001
9453<I>Please forgive me. I was responding to the same post you responded to. techreports-11/8/2001
9452<i>Amazing, given their warning, that the stock is up. </i> QCOM diElroy-11/7/2001
9451OK then........ If you agree that Valuation Matters (there does seem to be a chJacob Snyder-11/7/2001
9450<i>I never said gorillas are always undervalued</i> Please forgive BirdDog-11/7/2001
9449<I>As far a arguing the statement of "Gorillas are always undervaluedtechreports-11/7/2001
9448<i> I rather my stocks go up because I find value where the market doesn&#BirdDog-11/7/2001
9447Jacob Snyder, don't get me wrong, I agree valuation matters. I don't liktechreports-11/7/2001
9446re: did you sell them? I post all my trades, with reasoning, in real-time. In aJacob Snyder-11/6/2001
9445Hi, Re:<i>The NTAP 04C15s I recently bought, with the stock between 6.09 Selectric II-11/6/2001
9444re: buying at 17 wouldn't be a terrible mistake I suppose, in an attempt toJacob Snyder-11/6/2001
9443>> Tonight we will get a better look at the managements' projections &Uncle Frank-11/6/2001
9442NTAP: from $6 to $17 (Who forgot to buy LOW?) to $25 (USB WARBURG recently) to $Crystal ball-11/6/2001
9441Don't forget seasonality as another positive factor, coming out of Sept. - Ostraight life-11/6/2001
9440<I>Caveat: although I see nothing but blue sky above us, I see the same thtechreports-11/5/2001
9439I understand the concept of support and resistance. I understand it applies to MBirdDog-11/5/2001
9438Didn't I read somewhere that the time to buy is 6 months prior to the actualSecularBull-11/5/2001
9437re: I fail to understand why it should necessarily stall at the 200MA? In a beaJacob Snyder-11/5/2001
9436<i>Both of these charts seem to say to me that NTAP has had a great run anBirdDog-11/5/2001
9435You're right, on those two sites, about the 200DMA. I was reading off this cJacob Snyder-11/5/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News