SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Pro Choice Action Team
An SI Board Since February 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
948 8 0
Emcee:  YlangYlangBreeze Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Tired of the ongoing debate about a woman's right to choose, this thread is a Action Thread meant for those who have resolved in favor od a common goal:

Protection of Roe V. Wade & Reproductive Self Governance Rights Worldwide

In this forum a woman's right to choose is not open to debate. Such debate is off topic.
If and when you have resolved, for whatever reason, to support such rights, please feel free to join in our discussion of strategies. Otherwise take up the issue elsewere.

Post pertinent articles, info, petitions, links, proposed nominees, and events, dates of relevant decisions, appointments, cases, petitions. Bring contact your senator days to our attention, when there are decisions and or appointments pending.
Perhaps let our leaders know that we will not permit stacking of USSC that might threaten Roe V. Wade. Post links to printable pro-choice pamphlets, art, stories, slogans, and bumper stickers.

We each have our own reasons for supporting choice. Perhaps you think RU486 is okay, but draw the line there. Maybe you're a first trimester only person. There may be some efforts you feel are not in line with your personal reasons. Ignore those posts and/or posters. Neither should we quarrel amongst ourselves. We are here to get a job done, work towards a shared goal.
Please limit political tangential excursions as much as possible.
Pay Attention: PROLIFE and others like you: If you feel a need to debate a woman's right to choose take it to the Boxing Ring or elsewhere.
Subject 50472

This is not my thread. If you are Pro-Choice, on any level, it is your thread.
If you feel a poster is violating thread policy report sooner, not later.
I may not even be here.
This header, goal definition, and methods of action may be revised at any time due to contributor consensus.
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
948thank you for your polite responseKid Rock-4/24/2007
947Hello Kid, That is a "connection" *you* make. I do not. I see it aborPoet-4/24/2007
946now only if they could remove the connection to a babies deathKid Rock-4/24/2007
945What an odd reply. I think many of us realized that the abortion/breast cancer Poet-4/24/2007
944That should make a lot of post abortion women feel a little bit betterNeenny-4/24/2007
943From today's New York Times-- Large-scale study shows abortion does not leadPoet-4/24/2007
942azcentral.com Jan. 2, 2004 11:10 AM Brian Finkel, a once prominent Phoenix aboKid Rock-1/2/2004
941washingtonpost.com <b> Islamic Bloc, Christian Right Team Up to Lobby U.N.Thomas M.-6/22/2002
940I suspected as much but thought it would be more appropriate not to have one of Ann Corrigan-3/12/2002
939WHY was he allowed? Only because it's an un-moderated thread. I was sick of YlangYlangBreeze13/12/2002
938Why was PROLOSER allowed to contaminate this forum with his ignorant grunts, YlaAnn Corrigan-3/10/2002
937Couple small items...I hear the PRODEATHSQUAD was laying a lot of heat on congrePROLIFE14/27/2001
936I imagine you find it necessary to snort your snot often enough, PROLIFE, but itWin Smith-3/17/2001
935mooooo---snort snort- snot snot----get em goin there trench.--- meanwhile: Is PROLIFE13/16/2001
934Ladies.......start your engines! washingtonpost.comPatricia Trinchero-3/16/2001
933I think prison conditions should be improved not only for the innocent (who are Yogizuna-3/12/2001
932Please don't confuse the issue with details.YlangYlangBreeze-3/9/2001
931"F+++ for the future" Why Bjorn! You little devil. dailynews.yahoo.MulhollandDrive-3/9/2001
930We must remember that a certain percentage of people ending up in prison are innYogizuna-3/8/2001
929Yes, dogs carrying the ticks inside is a big problem for us too. When you first Yogizuna-3/8/2001
928Not to speak of all the fun women would miss out of by avoiding confrontations iPatricia Trinchero-3/8/2001
927I really don't care how many women sacrifice their uterine health on the altaverage joe-3/8/2001
926That is so true. But over the counter MAP would really screw things up not as muYlangYlangBreeze-3/7/2001
925RU-486 The doc's shoud know it's just (capitalism) creative destruction.Gordon A. Langston-3/7/2001
924I don't know about this RU486, it discriminates against hard working Americaaverage joe-3/7/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News