SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Investment Chat Board Lawsuits for Pros – moderated
An SI Board Since April 2005
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
120 7 0
Emcee:  Tom C Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
95Sladeck, you proved my point. Why are you obsessed with him? What's wrong rrufff-4/17/2005
94rrufff, get this through your thick head - I am not a follower of any guru. ThisJohn Sladek-4/17/2005
93SEC Delivers a Chorus of Misleading Information – April 13, 2005 STOCKGATE TODrrufff-4/17/2005
92More from prior cited work - footnote 26 26 Market makers may also be informed rrufff-4/17/2005
91This paper by a Fordham U prof is probably not something for the public but it srrufff-4/17/2005
90Opinions Kevin - lies are mis-statements of facts. I read the SEC report and thrrufff-4/17/2005
89Saying "that's a lie" is <B>not</B> a personal attack.Kevin Podsiadlik-4/17/2005
88<I>I never followed Overstock and don't have an opinion on the stock oKevin Podsiadlik-4/17/2005
87Again, with the personal attacks because you have nothing of substance to say, jrrufff-4/17/2005
86<I>and on the other side you have those who claim naked shorting doesn'Kevin Podsiadlik-4/17/2005
85FWIW, GPG on the Microcap Kitchen Thread is IMO the best stock picker around. Hrrufff-4/17/2005
84Obviously, in your kiss arse and suck poop ways, you have no reading comprehensirrufff-4/17/2005
83dog-that-won't-hunt, If you can load up before the big push (i.e., when hollJohn Sladek-4/17/2005
82I'm not defending anyone, unlike you, whose tongue seems to be in the posterrrufff-4/17/2005
81rruff, So when you defend him, you dont really know what you're talking abouJohn Sladek-4/17/2005
80Slaydeck, just run through your posts. You pretty much post anti-US anti-Israelrrufff-4/17/2005
79rruff, You see this is why people don't follow your posts - because you justJohn Sladek-4/17/2005
78marcos - it seems that is all you can do. You are obsessed with others because rrufff-4/17/2005
77Kevin, I want to modify my previous post to you. You actually seem to be one ofrrufff-4/17/2005
76Slaydeck, as far as washing hands and sharing things, it seems you are an experrrufff-4/17/2005
75rruff, I made some posts about hollen in his face on the Largo Vista thread, andJohn Sladek-4/17/2005
74marcos - it says something about you. "luring" posters Have nothing rrufff-4/17/2005
73There you guys go again. You can't refute the message. Seems to me the CEOrrufff-4/17/2005
72Pugs used to do what you're doing, come up with all sorts of extraneous stufmarcos-4/17/2005
71O/T: Use the phonecard that <i>AnthoPuke's</i> premiere bash-HOjmhollen-4/17/2005
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):