SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
WCOM
An SI Board Since July 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
11568 152 0 WCOM
Emcee:  Paul Berggren Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
9518Don't forget Q VZ SBC BLS are chipping away WCOM customers. GX has better asSoftechie-3/21/2002
9517Yes. Its not worth $60, it may not be worth $30 until the economy improves, but BWAC-3/21/2002
9516Yes I agree with that. WCOM should just take out Qwest IMO.Softechie-3/21/2002
9515Fear does not have to be rational and may be fueled by repeated unsubstantiated Oeconomicus-3/21/2002
9514OH! Oh man that's a lot of fear. So you're saying market is dead wrong oSoftechie-3/21/2002
9513Margin Bernie, Manic Depressive herd mentality unable to distinguish between busBWAC-3/21/2002
9512LOL! Keep pumping WCOM my friend.Softechie-3/21/2002
9511FEAR OF WHAT??? Chapter 11?Softechie-3/21/2002
9510Fear?Oeconomicus-3/21/2002
9509I'll second that!HandsOn-3/21/2002
9508I ain't shorting WCOM at $7...may be at $20...Softechie-3/21/2002
9507I wonder why WCOM is at $7? Got any answers?Softechie-3/21/2002
9506The fellow has fallen into traders trap. Its a mindset which induces one to thinBWAC-3/21/2002
9505Agreed, but when it becomes baseless accusations of wrongdoing (more of that at Oeconomicus-3/21/2002
9504RBD, I believe that everyone is entitled to their opinion, but also be prepared JakeStraw-3/21/2002
9503You should see the loonies throwing stones on the Mirant thread.Oeconomicus-3/21/2002
9502RDB, It always amazes me when people make a statement they base on fact & thJakeStraw-3/21/2002
9501Jake, softie is just that - an analytical softie. He can't back up his "Oeconomicus-3/21/2002
9500>>It doesn't come cheap for no reasons... Maybe. I guess the same canJakeStraw-3/21/2002
9499It doesn't come cheap for no reasons...be happy my friend...Softechie-3/21/2002
9498Hey, you came here and posted your conclusion(s). Now it's time to back themJakeStraw-3/21/2002
9497LOL! Take a look and do your own. I have my own conclusion.Softechie-3/21/2002
9496Where's your balance sheet analysis? How about giving us some ratios to workJakeStraw-3/21/2002
9495Falling earnings...high debts...SEC investigation...cooking books?...CEO problemSoftechie-3/21/2002
9494Why don't you explain to us what concerns you on their balance sheet and givJakeStraw-3/21/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News