SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Sepracor-Looks very promising
An SI Board Since August 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10280 115 0 SEPR
Emcee:  rkrw Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
9555Dew: Thanks for your post. If pfe can't even pursue a merger then it certainfred hayes-6/23/2006
9554<i>They aren't competing until the merger is finalized -- at least 180DewDiligence_on_SI-6/23/2006
9553RC: It was clearly mentioned in the conference call. It may have been out of confred hayes-6/23/2006
9552<i>Worrying about non-compete. Whether it would preclude a merger agreemenRCMac-6/23/2006
9551<i>With 3 kids now (one of them 6 weeks old),</i> Oh my goodness!..zeta1961-6/22/2006
9550Jon - I bet no insomnia problems for you right now. Kids beat any kind of sleepFiloF-6/22/2006
9549What was the wording of the "non-compete" used in the conference call?CrazyPete-6/22/2006
9548It is all speculation here. I would think a 180 day non-compete is next to uselRobohogs-6/22/2006
9547Jon, it didn't occur to me that a non-compete in the sleep market would precfred hayes-6/22/2006
9546Fred, I think Pfizer would consider Sepracor as being immaterial. I think brokerQualified Opinion-6/22/2006
9545Last post for now, but I remember when the NBIX/PFE deal was signed and how we wRobohogs-6/22/2006
9544Worrying about non-compete. Whether it would preclude a merger agreement that dRobohogs-6/22/2006
9543> lawyers slobbering< I don't get it. What is legal problem with pfe fred hayes-6/22/2006
9542Yes, I am now of the opinion there will be no deal with SEPR. PFE walks away froLJM-6/22/2006
9541If you believe that, then the corollary (sp?) is that PFE is walking away - SEPRRobohogs-6/22/2006
9540I doubt seriously that would fly. Just the announcement would hurt NBIX and havLJM-6/22/2006
9539I wonder if they can announce a deal since it would take 180 days to consumate aRobohogs-6/22/2006
9538Jon, my understanding is 180 days. I did not confirm this. eomfred hayes-6/22/2006
9537PFE could announce bid for SEPR tomorrow and it would take 6 months to close. IRobohogs-6/22/2006
9536Rob, don't care what they said. Don't think they would terminate I beforfred hayes-6/22/2006
9535Fred, last week Pfizer reiterated its $1 to $4 billion acquisition strategy. I dQualified Opinion-6/22/2006
9534Rob, you may be right. But my guess is that they are buying SEPR. If they wantedfred hayes-6/22/2006
9533Fred, my guess is that Pfizer is dropping the Insomnia market.Qualified Opinion-6/22/2006
9532Fred, I agree. What you are saying makes perfect sense. Sorry you got caughtLJM-6/22/2006
9531>this will languish and go lower.< Very likely so, but I can never time sfred hayes-6/22/2006
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News