SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Bill Wexler's Dog Pound
An SI Board Since March 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol SI Sentiment
10293 141 0 REFR ★★★★★ (Strong Buy)
Emcee:  Bill Wexler Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
9618REFR will have revs that are 100 times operating costs. No bubble. Going to tripN. Dixon-3/27/2003
9617Here is a significant post from about 3 years ago. Nanny Dixon should read this,RockyBalboa-3/27/2003
9616It went to 40 because all stocks went up. It was a <b>"bubble"&lRockyBalboa-3/27/2003
9615<i>but I still wonder how REFR wants to pay a dividend and with what</iN. Dixon-3/27/2003
9614Don't you remember shorting in single digits before it rose to $40? Are yoN. Dixon-3/27/2003
9613That was Joe Harary's statement not WSR. Basic overhead is approx. $4 millioN. Dixon-3/27/2003
9612Re: kjpod: projection by: ed_wesnofske (59/M/Oneonta, NY) 03/27/03 12:53 pm MsgN. Dixon-3/27/2003
9611All true,... but I still wonder how REFR wants to pay a dividend and with what; RockyBalboa-3/27/2003
9610It's all just boilerplate that the accountants make them put in, doncha knowKevin Podsiadlik-3/27/2003
9609I think Nixon is suggesting that REFR's SEC filings are not true.Hoatzin-3/27/2003
9608Oh gosh, you believe WSR knows more than REFR itself? Its in the SEC filings! RockyBalboa-3/27/2003
9607Dixon, I have a sure fire way for you to increase your probability of success iHank-3/27/2003
9606From WSR article January 2003: <b>REFR:</b> Once the investment comN. Dixon-3/27/2003
9605<i><b>It's a dividend play</b></i> Nix, I've heRockyBalboa-3/27/2003
9604<i>Let me know when you get done squeezing Kevin Podsialik's privates N. Dixon-3/27/2003
9603I can't let loose ALL my secrets, but I will say that it involves a VERY larKevin Podsiadlik-3/27/2003
9602Hello, Bill! How did you manage to cover 500 thou shorts? Lol.RockyBalboa-3/27/2003
9601Oh, didn't you hear? Miss Cleo told Dixon that I'm really Bill Wexler.Kevin Podsiadlik-3/27/2003
9600<I>23% gain in one day "good" ? I'd say THAT'S an undersbenchpress550-3/27/2003
9599<i>You know if you are a "big time" glass company with the best N. Dixon-3/27/2003
9598Kevin... Great Find. You know if you are a "big time" glass companBob Trocchi-3/27/2003
9597<B>Look familiar?</b> amerihomes-saleshomes.com ams-michigan.com beaKevin Podsiadlik-3/27/2003
9596<B>Brand New </b>http://www.i-shade.comN. Dixon-3/27/2003
9595Agreed Kevin, Nix appears to be depressed because it fails to impress new folks RockyBalboa-3/27/2003
9594<i>You're trying to bore us to death, aren't you, Dix. </i>N. Dixon-3/26/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News