SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Inco-Voisey Bay Nickel [ T.N.V]
An SI Board Since July 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1615 12 0 N
Emcee:  buylowsellhigh Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
965 Was part of the agenda of the political forces in Toronto to let Tobin have enonickel61-2/2/2000
964 BGraham Inco have proven to be very stuipd with setting the course of smelter tMitchell-2/2/2000
963 Isn't the irony of this situation that Inco was stopped back in 1997 from dnickel61-2/2/2000
962 "Thats why Inco will stay the course not matter what and however long, NFBGraham-2/2/2000
961 Cumbrian I was hardly agreeing with Elmer. With respect to shipping concentrateMitchell-2/2/2000
960 If you and Elmer think it is as simple as build a smelter and wheel in the concCumbrian-2/2/2000
959 Elmer no deal means your countrymen will be filling up our legions and supportiMitchell-2/2/2000
958 Flash from the past---- Post says Inco in a catch 22 with Voisey Bay Diamond BGraham-2/2/2000
957 Another view from within ten kilometres of the CN tower, doesn't carry muchBat Man-2/2/2000
956 Hey! Naldrett is 100% correct! I went to U. of T. so I KNOW that his opinion cabuylowsellhigh-2/2/2000
955 <b>News from The Globe and Mail</b> Tobin guilty of hyperbole in VJohn E.Quinn-2/2/2000
954 I can't understand why they would have made false promises. I just think thclarkiebaby-2/2/2000
953 Buylowsellhigh,Its time for you to stay true to your code name. The Inco Voiseynickel61-2/1/2000
952 You should go back and read responses 945 and 946, this has already been acknowBat Man-1/21/2000
951 You guys might remember the event, but none too clearly. INCO did already own 2Cumbrian-1/21/2000
950 Well thank you, John. Good to know someone else remembers the events at the timBat Man-1/20/2000
949 Elmer; <b>Congratulations</b> You win the cigar.INCO did know,andJohn E.Quinn-1/20/2000
948 Nick: You asked..... "When you say take an objective view of future proBGraham-1/20/2000
947 Nick: I wouldn't have a clue if they paid to much or not b'y , I'BGraham-1/20/2000
946 INCO should have known what was happening at least as early as Tek, I think INCBat Man-1/20/2000
945 I think that Inco signed a deal to purchase 25% and to market all of the nickelnickel61-1/20/2000
944 A very good argument to try for responsible action by your community to attranickel61-1/20/2000
943 I'll help you with the first question on paying too much, as to the size ofBat Man-1/20/2000
942 The problem is, Nfld cannot afford to export anymore jobs be it to Quebec, OntaBat Man-1/20/2000
941 How would you know if they paid too much for the Voisey Bay Deposit? What do yonickel61-1/20/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News