SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Rock Resources
An SI Board Since May 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1996 10 0 RKR
Emcee:  Dan Modi Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
971 Yes thanks.. I saw that DS was always in the buy area until about the 14th. I tJAS-3/17/1999
970 Held up not bad. Stew-3/17/1999
969 Will look hard at a buy tomorrow..If we continue to trade at this level I will 1st.mate-3/17/1999
968 DS was up 158,000 shares since the 23 Feb. At one point they were up 201,000 bethe Chief-3/17/1999
967 RKR is down on vol on 9,12, and 17th. Will be holding till I get more info but JAS-3/17/1999
966 <i>By the way, how many holes to prove up a 2 1/2 billion ton deposit? Ithe Chief-3/16/1999
965 It is indeed a fine line between bonanza and bust with these big porphyries! AMike Gold-3/16/1999
964 Thats why it was proposed as my "guess". I will stick with my guess athe Chief-3/16/1999
963 I won't let you get away with that 1% assumption! Ha. A similar property NWMike Gold-3/16/1999
962 Hi Mike. <i>Actually, I think the latest theory on whether it will be the Chief-3/16/1999
961 <i> From what appears on this thread; it appears that this is a major finthe Chief-3/16/1999
960 HI All From what appears on this thread; it appears that this is a major find.Keith Minler-3/16/1999
959 "This insinuates higher internal temperatures when the geology was formed.Mike Gold-3/16/1999
958 I suppose if one wished to be totally conservative a reduction to .63% may be wthe Chief-3/16/1999
957 Couple of comments Chief! Rather than using the 1% copper-I would use 0.63% Cu-Mike Gold-3/16/1999
956 I have addressed this to Mike so that he can check the data again! My feelingsthe Chief-3/16/1999
955 Well after a 16hr sleep marathon....I'm back. So lets go over my <b> the Chief-3/16/1999
954 And that does not include the extensions.No matter what,at 1% copper or even 0.Ceedee-3/16/1999
953 Hi Chief: I believe there is a little mistake in your calculations. If the areagianelda-3/15/1999
952 Thanks Chief. Need to let the motor warm up a bit!!<gggg> Stew-3/15/1999
951 Could be that the flight back from PV Mexico from Midnight last night till 0800the Chief-3/15/1999
950 "so take my 50% anomaly size as true potential size." Chief-your braMike Gold-3/15/1999
949 I hope you noticed that I still have trouble converting to Km's from miles.the Chief-3/15/1999
948 Hey Chief!! . . . .Great to hear from you and thanks for the info.!!! Stew-3/15/1999
947 Hi Ceedee and "everyone"! I just finished my "self-imposed keybothe Chief-3/15/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News