SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Semi-Equips - Buy when BLOOD is running in the streets!
An SI Board Since June 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10921 222 0 LRCX
Emcee:  Cary Salsberg Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
9721"And, if the Nas went to 800, what would its PE be?" The answer to thJohn Cuthbertson-4/16/2001
9720You're right. People were worried about it, and the possibility was priced iJacob Snyder-4/16/2001
9719"...in those two previous downturns, the economy was not facing the possibiJohn Cuthbertson-4/16/2001
9718No not BK...but correct most will be close to 1/2'd.$Mogul-4/16/2001
9717Jacob, having reviewed your recent posts, there is no denying the logicality of Jerome-4/15/2001
9716Hi Jacob, Did it feel like short any thing and make money? If it did, I think tsemi2000-4/15/2001
9715Don, thanks for the LA Times article. It gives perspective. I recommend the teleGottfried-4/15/2001
9714Gottfried, Thanks for the pointer to the new site - good information there. I Donald Wennerstrom-4/15/2001
9713And, if the Nas went to 800, what would its PE be? If we are in an environment oJacob Snyder-4/15/2001
9712Ex_Dilbert.... what is the market share to the right of each stock? INTC should Jerome-4/15/2001
9711<i> If you look at the 16 stocks that make up the sox </i> Those 1Pink Minion-4/15/2001
9710<i>I see the SOX at mid to high 300's to happen in 2001. </i> TJerome-4/14/2001
9709re: where the SOX goes short/medium term: We are now just below 600 on the SOX.Jacob Snyder-4/14/2001
9708Jacob, I agree..and to boot i would not pay a Price/Sales more then 3 for ANY Se$Mogul-4/14/2001
9707Thanks. I bookmarked it. eomJacob Snyder-4/14/2001
9706Jacob, no matter what happens next, your point 7 makes sense. I found an economiGottfried-4/14/2001
9705Well said!Cary Salsberg-4/14/2001
9704re: Care to enumerate the reasons why you think we are in for a 1973 type of recJacob Snyder-4/14/2001
9703Jacob, you are too much at times. Care to enumerate the reasons why you think weBerk-4/14/2001
9702I agree. The high capex is a great way for intc to gain advantage over the compwillcousa-4/13/2001
9701Jacob, ><i>I could easily be wrong. I was wrong, in the summer and fallGottfried-4/13/2001
9700<i>It's been a steep decline off the top, but that does not mean the tw0z-4/13/2001
9699re: The original issue had to do with why this cycle is so much faster than prevJacob Snyder-4/13/2001
9698Well, I think you're certainly right that real-time data helps in making a lJacob Snyder-4/13/2001
9697At any inflection point, the data is likely to be noisy. When it is obvious, thw0z-4/13/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):