SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Zeev's Turnips - No Politics
An SI Board Since November 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
99280 411 0
Emcee:  Steve Lee Type:  Moderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
97280Near 22.95-23. Actually QQQ is supposed to be NDX/40, but it usually trades minusylvester80-7/22/2002
97279briefing.com commentary Updated: 23-Jul-02 General Commentary Monday's outLTK007-7/22/2002
97278~925/40 => ~23 (eom)Win-Lose-Draw-7/22/2002
97277don't forget all the convertible debt which required shorting to lock in prooldirtybastard-7/22/2002
97276whats that relate to on QQQ??Rich1-7/22/2002
97275Too bad then cause my accounts show that I have been right all year. <vbg>sylvester80-7/22/2002
97274I hear you. And here is it again. Another idiot BEAR anal-cyst on CNBC says thissylvester80-7/22/2002
97273I agree with your assessment. We're not seeing "THE" bottom, but aKevinMark-7/22/2002
97272one reason is i have him on ignore now. but i have officially annointed sylvestLTK007-7/22/2002
97271Many stocks have already found their bottoms and will retrace back slightly duriKevinMark-7/22/2002
97270hey, it's clear shorting is getting out of hand when Al Michaels is portrayeWin-Lose-Draw-7/22/2002
97269Then we will have a CEO ass"kook"ing behind the woodshed! <g>KevinMark-7/22/2002
97268are you eyeballing, or can you give a specific p/c ratio on the QQQs now??? LikeLTK007-7/22/2002
97267Near NDX at 925. I'm calling this number out for tomorrow. I'd be buyingsylvester80-7/22/2002
97266<i>false economic reports generated by the Clinton-Gore...etc</i> cWin-Lose-Draw-7/22/2002
97265Any thoughts on this? I notice there is a growing feeling of bearish confidence Boolish-7/22/2002
97264Even without that, you have the link that I provided that shows incremental montsylvester80-7/22/2002
97263Yes but QQQ index has been the single most reliable indicator on options that wemishedlo-7/22/2002
97262here is $NALOW stockcharts.com[g,a]decayyay[df][pf][vc60][J4708578,Y]&listNuLTK007-7/22/2002
97261i'd put more stock in that if it was percentage of shares or days of tradingWin-Lose-Draw-7/22/2002
97260i like astrikos number best as it is for all stocks, and it is 0.55. i gather yoLTK007-7/22/2002
97259here's my VIX chart KM, and you will note i cancelled the buy signal i had pLTK007-7/22/2002
97258VIX hit 49.67 today. Can't be far away. quote.yahoo.com^VIX&d=c&t=5sylvester80-7/22/2002
97257Agree..Rich1-7/22/2002
97256what will be the excuse tomorrow, NVLS, you think?lh56-7/22/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):