SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Semi-Equips - Buy when BLOOD is running in the streets!
An SI Board Since June 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10921 222 0 LRCX
Emcee:  Cary Salsberg Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
9796Hopefully, he'll reiterate the $300M / employeee target, confirm that these Ian@SI-5/1/2001
9795Ian, Hill will talk again Thursday... <i> Richard S. Hill, Novellus' cGottfried-5/1/2001
9794Story is false. If you listen to Rick Hill at today's H&Q tech conf, Ian@SI-5/1/2001
9793Novellus sees slow recovery marketwatch.comSemiBull-5/1/2001
9792Great article (from Fortune) on TSMC, UMC, fab capacities, etc. fortune.com -RoRoger Zucchet-5/1/2001
9791directinvesting.comGottfried-4/29/2001
9790***OT**** Direct stock purchase plans Would any viewer know of a website that Jerome-4/29/2001
9789Thread, siliconstrategies.com Does anyone know how this effects the 0.13u rampCharles R-4/26/2001
9788Another reason technology has to move onward and upward is this: the current stuJerome-4/25/2001
9787Perhaps. or.. what some have been saying is true... inventory of over ordered chKirk ©-4/23/2001
9786Kirk, you are closer to the scene of technology transformations than most of us.Jerome-4/23/2001
9785Allright, how about a big FAT one. A@P (another threader) always bets a diet coPink Minion-4/22/2001
9784<i>I'll bet anyone a Mountain Dew we see Sox in the low 300's thisJerome-4/22/2001
9783ex-Dilbert, I find you on many of my readings of the threads, " High Tech MStanX Long-4/22/2001
9782<i> Has anyone noticed most equipment stocks are 50 -100% higher than earlPink Minion-4/22/2001
9781Many High-Tech Firms See End of Downturn biz.yahoo.com excerpt: ... a consensQ.-4/21/2001
9780<I>The problem is that, as John pointed out, the weightings in the index aKirk ©-4/21/2001
9779<I>Anyone investing in this industry today has to expect relatively modestKirk ©-4/21/2001
9778<i>....investing contrary to these slap-in-the face indicators would be boorkrious-4/21/2001
9777SpecialK, Thanks for the heads up. Just goes to show, you can't believe eversat2000-4/21/2001
9776Novellus as a barometer.....I have never thought of it in that manner. Here is Jerome-4/21/2001
9775It's a one hand vs. the other thing. One the one hand, business conditions scott_jiminez-4/21/2001
9774The problem is that, as John pointed out, the weightings in the index are not stMath Junkie-4/21/2001
9773OK, I did a full program that did all 100 companies and it gives a p/e of 168.8!Kirk ©-4/21/2001
9772Here is a table I did where I took the top 20 companies in the NADAQ 100 to calcKirk ©-4/21/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News