SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
WCOM
An SI Board Since July 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
11568 152 0 WCOM
Emcee:  Paul Berggren Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
9843As for the CEO, wanna bet that WCOM 'forgives' the debt before declaringJohn Koligman-4/29/2002
9842I loaded WCOM into one of my Level2 displays just for the hell of it. Could notJohn Koligman-4/29/2002
9841el - are you sure TA even applies at these levels?? <ggg>. Trading of WCOJohn Koligman-4/29/2002
9840Geepers! what do you think I have been trying to tell you guys for the last 6 wec.hinton-4/29/2002
9839You should watch the chart and forget about EBITDA.With the slide 1 dollar down el paradisio-4/29/2002
9838R.D.: You could be right about that self-fulfilling prophecy. That's theJohn Curtis-4/29/2002
9837The game? Perhaps everyone fears that predictions of BK will become a self-fulfiOeconomicus-4/29/2002
9836So whats the game? Quarterly EBITDA of $1.8 Billion and Cash Flow after Capital BWAC-4/29/2002
9835Rock: <i>I wonder what is going to happen to the WCOM CEO??? </i> John Curtis-4/29/2002
9834I guess you don't think WCOM is heading for BK? Pretty scary trading patternRock_nj-4/29/2002
9833I guess you don't think WCOM is heading for BK? Pretty scary trading patternRock_nj-4/29/2002
9832I'm back in long this morning. ~SB~SecularBull-4/29/2002
9831Its been even more amazing to watch the FUDders in action.BWAC-4/29/2002
9830BWAC: What do I think? I dunno. These days I've played WCOM often from a John Curtis-4/29/2002
9829How about WorldCom and Qwest join forces? That would make WORST...heheheheSoftechie-4/29/2002
9828So? John what do you think? The FUD has been almost to a record level on WCOM.BWAC-4/29/2002
9827Ever get the impression the boilers have exploded amid-ship and the bow, with a John Curtis-4/29/2002
9826WCOM well below $3. Heading for bankruptcy? It sure seems like it is. This ship Rock_nj-4/29/2002
9825Wcom bonds 8/15/2003 coupon 6.25% , 82.50$ per 100$,yields 22.648% .imfo from cc.hinton-4/29/2002
9824<<I own a large position in the stock but feel that management and the BODfarkarooski-4/28/2002
9823That makes sense,you might be interested in this article about Bernie.Whenever Bel paradisio-4/27/2002
9822I think you are correct that the SEC review is an ongoing problem. If they get HH-4/27/2002
9821It is not a secret that at least 4 major holders of the stock want Bernie out. Ige-4/27/2002
9820Any thoughts on how long the SEC inqy could take??? This is another factor hurtiFNS-4/27/2002
9819Bloomberg must really have it in for wcom.check out bloomberg top financial newsc.hinton-4/27/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):