SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Complacency Indexes
An SI Board Since August 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1487 37 0
Emcee:  TechTrader42 Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
987CAT is trending which makes it different than BCE which was at the bottom of a cMechanicalMethod-4/25/2002
986Oh that cat thread. Very funny. If he was a buy and holder he should be lookiMonty Lenard-4/24/2002
985Cat tales: Subject 24052 As for the monthly charts, I suggested that one of theTechTrader42-4/24/2002
984A cat diary? Well I need to go find that..sounds interesting. Look at the montMonty Lenard-4/24/2002
983I'm lookin' forward to the market's plenilunary condition at the endTechTrader42-4/24/2002
982With CAT, the 200 SMA may be too close for it to resist a visit. Once they plungTechTrader42-4/24/2002
981Gotta tell you this story Brooke. You recall how we(especially me) made enemiMonty Lenard-4/24/2002
980I was just thinking about the wcom pick our "friend" called. No wondeMonty Lenard-4/24/2002
979Jeff, what happened is that all of a sudden she felt she could really cut loose Monty Lenard-4/24/2002
978LOL, I just came in from moving that equipment into my shop and saw the suckers Monty Lenard-4/24/2002
977Listen, it is easy to see what the problem is with WCOM. They aren't big enOral Roberts-4/24/2002
976Yes, credulous investors want <i>picks,</i> picks for the new bull mTechTrader42-4/24/2002
975<i>one might well relieve oneself, in one's pants</I> I was temOral Roberts-4/24/2002
974Here's something for the credulous investor: "The results, while hit hTechTrader42-4/24/2002
973<i>Hippopotomonstrosesquippedaliophobia is a problem on this thread. I donJoseph Silent-4/24/2002
972There was even the sucker bounce, Monty. It's amazing how that works, once sTechTrader42-4/24/2002
971Does anyone know where I could obtain a copy of Iamblichos' groundbreaking wTechTrader42-4/24/2002
970Most of the words are just faithful transcriptions of Monty's exclamations iTechTrader42-4/24/2002
969I have admired your wit and grasp of the market but am amazed now at your vocabuOral Roberts-4/24/2002
968My TA certainly isn't worth that much, Bob. I don't think the entire bodTechTrader42-4/24/2002
967for pete's sake Brooke, you have exceeded the capacity of the Merriam_Webstebob wallace-4/24/2002
966Hippopotomonstrosesquippedaliophobia is a problem on this thread. I don't knTechTrader42-4/24/2002
965I get a new dictionary link and now find it isn't complete enough! What am Oral Roberts-4/24/2002
964Monty: It remains to be seen whether this is just a predictable sucker bounce foTechTrader42-4/24/2002
963No more divergence: ST Naz CI: 72.256 66.159 MT Naz CI: 58.736 53.779 LT Naz CITechTrader42-4/24/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):