Advanced Micro Devices - Off Topic | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes
Advanced Micro Devices - Off Topic

An SI Board Since June 2002

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
1141	14	0

Emcee: jjayxxxx	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
991	All the more reason to leave it to SI. They can handle getting rid of true spamm	dougSF30	-	4/16/2007
990	I'm glad you did because I was going to step forward. I don't visit that	Jim McMannis	-	4/16/2007
989	It's a thankless job.	Jim McMannis	-	4/16/2007
988	<i>Now there's some sloppy thinking. Par for the course, from you.<	muzosi	-	4/15/2007
987	<i>you resort posting "no it isn't, you liar" to everything	dougSF30	-	4/15/2007
986	<i>No, I think that tearing down BS claims by ostrich longs should be allo	muzosi	-	4/15/2007
985	<i>and stop insulting people in the future.</i> Perhaps you should	dougSF30	-	4/15/2007
984	i see that you have been suspended again. try to cool off and stop insulting peo	muzosi	-	4/15/2007
983	<i>How nice for you that you want to take away others' votes.</i>	muzosi	-	4/15/2007
982	How nice for you that you want to take away others' votes. Why is it some pe	dougSF30	-	4/15/2007
981	>> to bring the a------- out of some people Are you making up for lost ti	Sarmad Y. Hermiz	-	4/15/2007
980	as someone who has been suspended as frequently as you're, i don't think	muzosi	-	4/15/2007
979	I still say "no moderator". (other than SI rules).	dougSF30	-	4/15/2007
978	<i>Instead you announce that Intel's future yields will be 20 times as	dougSF30	-	4/15/2007
977	"This of course does not change my earlier request for a successor in any w	combjelly	-	4/15/2007
976	Yeah, he's just so well-balanced, like in this post, for example: Message 2	dougSF30	-	4/15/2007
975	Bummer, Rupert would have been good.	Jim McMannis	-	4/15/2007
974	Rupert withdraws (his PM to me is posted below). This of course does not change	Rink	-	4/15/2007
973	TGP, your suggestion to solve the PM problem (ignore directly followed by un-ign	Rink	-	4/13/2007
972	I seem to recall both you and mas being granted exceptional amounts of slack, ir	dougSF30	-	4/13/2007
971	"What is wrong with banning people who make trouble? Has nothing to do with	combjelly	-	4/13/2007
970	Doug, Re: I think you're probably forgetting the getting-out-of-AMD-in-the30	TGPTNDR	-	4/13/2007
969	<i>My impression is that you're, over the last 9 months or so, behind	dougSF30	-	4/13/2007
968	Doug, I tried to PM this response and got that damned one or the other of us has	TGPTNDR	-	4/13/2007
967	RU1, Re: And since I do not have you on ignore I assumed it was you. Obviously a	TGPTNDR	-	4/12/2007

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):