SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
BORL: Time to BUY!
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10836 19 0 BORL
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
9936 <i>Anybody have any comments on Borland's plans to change its comapnyTChai-4/18/1998
9935 RE: <i> What concerns me is the seemingly endless increases in stock optiDavid R-4/18/1998
9934 What concerns me is the seemingly endless increases in stock option grant limitNeil Booth-4/17/1998
9933 Well, they're calling it the "new" Borland as they move away fromKashish King-4/17/1998
9932 Anybody have any comments on Borland's plans to change its comapny name? SLewis Edinburg-4/17/1998
9931 I think that I will sit tight with BORL. I am tempted to buy some May 10'sDavid R-4/17/1998
9930 I had my broker put in a sel @ 1/8, and my expectation is that they will expireDavid R-4/17/1998
9929 David, I just gave an order to exercise BLQDB for May rally. What's your Bipin Prasad-4/17/1998
9928 Same here 8^( , but can't win all the time, right ? I'm going to exBipin Prasad-4/17/1998
9927infoworld.com Sounds like Borland will not licence the Integrated Transaction SJocelyn Ally-4/17/1998
9926 Looks like my Apr 10's expire worthless. 1/8 is hardly worth the trouble oDavid R-4/17/1998
9925 Computer Associates is rarely mentioned as a potential suitor. Anyone with anyMark Bracey-4/17/1998
9924 David, I believe most of them are short coverings. Also don't wanBipin Prasad-4/17/1998
9923 Please explain. Apr calls expire today. Could the volume be driven by sellingDavid R-4/17/1998
9922 Apr10c <b> Volume 1,312</b>. It's very <b>bullish </b&Bipin Prasad-4/17/1998
9921 Has anyone come across any news that might explain the upsurge yesterday at theLewis Edinburg-4/17/1998
9920 My RT is showing 53,600 shares at this time awaiting to be traded upon open witPCSS-4/17/1998
9919 <i>If they have a billion dollars of loose change to chuck around, why oni-node-4/17/1998
9918 <i>verisimilitude?</i> David, Your vocabulary never ceases to i-node-4/17/1998
9917 Hi David - On the acquisition front, the scenerio I have been dreaming about laGhassan I. Ghandour-4/17/1998
9916 Hi Paul - A good move indeed, and on good volume (although the volume did not rGhassan I. Ghandour-4/17/1998
9915 Tread, anyone have any insight specifically what possible negatives might thereTTOSBT-4/17/1998
9914 David, Re; >"Stranger things have happened, of course. But mostly they TTOSBT-4/17/1998
9913 >><i>The acquisition of Borland would fill a HUGE gap in IBM's David Miller-4/17/1998
9912 David, Re: >"Good for a quiet chuckle, I suppose.<" And for opTTOSBT-4/17/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News