SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Suburban Lodges of America (SLAM)
An SI Board Since May 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
35 1 0 SLAM
Emcee:  sds Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
35 Slam has gone down very consistently. It is now $ 7.50. Many small caps have VALUESPEC-9/22/1998
34 Valuespec, Still holding my SLAM & SKYC. I have to rethink a few thingsRick Hudson-8/13/1998
33 Hello Rick, I sold my SLAM in the last few days for an average of just over $ 1VALUESPEC-8/13/1998
32 Valuespec, I took a big chunk off the table last week. Along with you I'Rick Hudson-8/6/1998
31 Rick, what else are you looking at? VALUESPEC VALUESPEC-8/6/1998
30 Valuespec, It does look attractive at this level. But so do a lot of other Rick Hudson-8/6/1998
29 I bought some SLAM back in the very low $10's. SLAM: $ 10.50b $ 11.00a VALUESPEC-8/6/1998
28 Slam closed at $ 9.75 yesterday. These small caps are getting crushed. Each dVALUESPEC-8/6/1998
27 I guess I should update. I got rid of the remainder of my SLAM for a loss at $VALUESPEC-7/29/1998
26 I'm still holding some shares. I expect this quarter to be good. HopefullVALUESPEC-7/5/1998
25 I've been looking at SLAM for about 6 months. SLAM looks like a good buy aRick Hudson-6/25/1998
24 Valuespec, I'm hanging on to my SLAM.... Right now, the stock seems prettysds-6/22/1998
23 I own some SLAM which I bought recently at $16.25. This stock seems undervalueVALUESPEC-6/10/1998
22 The way he phrased it is very difficult to get across. It was almost like, &quAlexander Hardin-2/12/1998
21 Alexander, its is absolutely impossible for size to overcome poor management. sds-2/12/1998
20 You may be right about ESA's management. A good friend of mine was high upAlexander Hardin-2/12/1998
19 In re: shareholder suits... You know, that is an interesting topic you broughtsds-2/12/1998
18 I don't own ESA and I wont for the time being. I just think they will do bAlexander Hardin-2/12/1998
17 Atlanta should be a temporary issue... From the very few conversations I'vsds-2/12/1998
16 The other problem I see is the concentration is Atlanta. I think the businessAlexander Hardin-2/12/1998
15 Alexander, I don't think that's the case in SLAM's niche... I compsds-2/12/1998
14 The biggest problem with SLAM is it's size. Other competitors have gotten Alexander Hardin-2/9/1998
13 Slam's not doing well today. It is $ 12.12b and $ 12.50a. I don't hVALUESPEC-1/26/1998
12 I sold my remaining SLAM (not much) @ $ 13.25. I wanted to increase another poVALUESPEC-1/2/1998
11 Thanks, SDS. I don't mind hearing the bearish side. If I know what they aVALUESPEC-12/22/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):