SMID - Smith-Midland Corporation | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks
SMID - Smith-Midland Corporation

An SI Board Since April 1998

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
41	3	0	SMID

Emcee: DavidCG	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
41	SMID to benefit from the Obama trillion for public works? Time for a re-entry?	SGJ	-	12/14/2008
40	The following is from the WallStreetReporter Interview (the points are also ment	ghmm	-	8/25/2006
39	SMID got smacked on tough comp against last year when they had inaugural contrac	sams291	-	5/15/2006
38	AL Frank Fund is still holding a very large position (14%) the fund is very valu	ghmm	-	2/15/2006
37	10:42 a.m. 14th--smid absolutely poised for lift-off. Hope it doesn't fall	Jane Hafker	-	12/14/2005
36	I'm a bag holder. Not happy as usual holding bags. It's bothering me t	Jane Hafker	-	12/5/2005
35	$3.5MM Contract for SMID Jefferson at Inigo's Crossing Chooses SLENDERWALL(	SGJ	-	11/30/2005
34	Wow!! A must listen interview... Mr. Smith all but says a great quarter is com	ghmm	-	11/1/2005
33	Ophelia could have had an impact Jane, but for now more sellers than buyers. MM	SGJ	-	9/16/2005
32	hafker to hafker...apparently no one agrees Ophelia threatened SMID's bases.	Jane Hafker	-	9/16/2005
31	AH. The current death dive of the stock with no real reason... We are ignoring	Jane Hafker	-	9/15/2005
30	To: Texbanker I am trying to buy more right here. That's my bid for 100	raddad	-	9/15/2005
29	Low volume is playing havoc with the PPS. I am going to buy more if it gets to 2	SGJ	-	9/15/2005
28	To: Jane Hafker Problem is Jane at the time the obvious technicals were not	raddad	-	9/14/2005
27	Am not panicked, for sure, just wish I had sold at the obvious technicals on $4.	Jane Hafker	-	9/14/2005
26	To:Jane Hafker I know it's frustrating to let profits slip away because	raddad	-	9/14/2005
25	no sweat unless one let a good profit slip by and didn't sell at 4.00. The	Jane Hafker	-	9/12/2005
24	Low volume drift down. Look for support at $3.25. No sweat. In buying range.	SGJ	-	9/12/2005
23	WHY THE DIVE? ANYONE KNOW? NOT HAPPY.	Jane Hafker	-	9/12/2005
22	I think the last quarter numbers scared some people (temporarily). I must admit	ghmm	-	9/11/2005
21	<i>Correct me if wrong.</i> No I think you have it now. This stock	SGJ	-	9/9/2005
20	Tex, I did jump in a few cents later. Am holding happily, but sure as heck wish	Jane Hafker	-	9/9/2005
19	Jane, no offense, but the time to buy was back when you were wringing your hands	SGJ	-	9/8/2005
18	Patentlawm...good you spoke to SMID people directly. I also spoke to Lawrence,	Jane Hafker	-	9/8/2005
17	Thanks and same to you Frank. Looks like we have a big winner here.	SGJ	-	9/8/2005

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):